Usage Information
Potentiation of fentanyl-induced respiratory depression by alcohol is not fully reversed by naloxone
Abstract
The high frequency of opioid overdose deaths often involves co-use of alcohol, which is reported in approximately 30% of fentanyl fatalities. Both substances depress respiratory function, and their combined effects can be lethal. The present study investigated physiological parameters of respiratory-depressant effects of fentanyl when coadministered with alcohol and their sensitivity to naloxone reversal using whole-body plethysmography in male and female Long-Evans rats. Administration of a high, sedative-like dose of alcohol alone or fentanyl alone resulted in no mortality, but fentanyl plus alcohol led to mortality rates of 42% and 33% in females and males, respectively. The fentanyl+alcohol combination reduced minute ventilation and increased apneic pauses compared with either drug alone. Lower, binge-like alcohol doses when combined with fentanyl also amplified respiratory depression. Pretreatment with naloxone did not fully restore normal respiration. Naloxone administered after fentanyl+alcohol transiently reversed the decrease in minute ventilation but did not reverse apneic pauses. Fentanyl-dependent rats were partially tolerant to fentanyl- and fentanyl+alcohol–induced respiratory depression, but alcohol-dependent rats exhibited sensitization to alcohol- and fentanyl+alcohol–induced apnea. These findings highlight physiological parameters of severe respiratory risks with fentanyl+alcohol co-use, which are inadequately reversed by naloxone, underscoring the need for targeted strategies to manage opioid+alcohol overdoses.
Authors
Emma V. Frye, Lyndsay E. Hastings, Aniah N. Matthews, Adriana Gregory-Flores, Janaina C.M. Vendruscolo, Lindsay A. Kryszak, Shelley N. Jackson, Aidan J. Hampson, Nora D. Volkow, Leandro F. Vendruscolo, Renata C.N. Marchette, George F. Koob
Usage data is cumulative from February 2026 through July 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 3,425 | 0 |
| 487 | 0 | |
| Figure | 793 | 0 |
| Table | 1,010 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 239 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 285 | 0 |
| Totals | 6,239 | 0 |
| Total Views | 6,239 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
