Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact

Usage Information

AVIL is dispensable for baseline neurobehavioral and somatosensory function in mice
Sarah A. Lynch, Martyna Glowczyk-Gluc, Yiwei Wang, Summer Johnson, Xinrui Shi, Abdul-Salam Gidado, Alexis Johnson, Christopher Deppmann, John Lukens, Hui Li
Sarah A. Lynch, Martyna Glowczyk-Gluc, Yiwei Wang, Summer Johnson, Xinrui Shi, Abdul-Salam Gidado, Alexis Johnson, Christopher Deppmann, John Lukens, Hui Li
View: Text | PDF
Research In-Press Preview Neuroscience Oncology

AVIL is dispensable for baseline neurobehavioral and somatosensory function in mice

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Advillin (AVIL) is an actin-binding protein expressed in peripheral sensory neurons and Merkel cells, but aberrantly upregulated in several malignancies, including low-grade glioma, glioblastoma, and rhabdomyosarcoma. AVIL’s oncogenic activity and restricted adult tissue expression make it an attractive therapeutic target; however, its physiological function and the safety of AVIL inhibition remain incompletely understood. We evaluated genetic and pharmacologic targeting of Avil using neurobehavioral and somatosensory assays in vivo. Constitutive and conditional Avil knockout mice, generated by exons 7 and 8 deletion, underwent behavioral testing assessing anxiety-related and exploratory behaviors, motor coordination, affective responses, and learning and memory. Nociceptive and tactile sensory function were evaluated alongside histologic analysis of peripheral mechanosensory architecture. In parallel, a first-in-class AVIL inhibitor was assessed in vivo. Avil-deficient mice exhibited normal exploratory and anxiety-related behavior, intact motor coordination, preserved affective responses, and unaltered learning and memory. Loss or pharmacologic inhibition of advillin did not impair nociceptive processing, tactile sensitivity, or peripheral mechanosensory architecture, and histologic abnormalities were not detected. Together, these findings show preserved baseline behavioral and sensory outcomes following lifelong Avil loss, with complementary evidence of tolerability following pharmacologic inhibition under the conditions tested, supporting AVIL as a potentially well-tolerated therapeutic target in cancer.

Authors

Sarah A. Lynch, Martyna Glowczyk-Gluc, Yiwei Wang, Summer Johnson, Xinrui Shi, Abdul-Salam Gidado, Alexis Johnson, Christopher Deppmann, John Lukens, Hui Li

×

Usage data is cumulative from October 2026 through October 2026.

Usage JCI PMC
Text version 100 0
PDF 58 0
Supplemental data 29 0
Citation downloads 40 0
Totals 227 0
Total Views 227

Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.

Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.

Advertisement

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts