Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Effect of ligands and HIV latency-reversing agents on estrogen receptor α in CD4+ T cells
Cristina Ceriani, Priya Khetan, Anthony Abeyta-Lopez, Kena J. Lemu, Prachi Meher, Brigitte Allard, Katherine S. James, Anne-Marie W. Turner, David M. Margolis, Nancie M. Archin
Cristina Ceriani, Priya Khetan, Anthony Abeyta-Lopez, Kena J. Lemu, Prachi Meher, Brigitte Allard, Katherine S. James, Anne-Marie W. Turner, David M. Margolis, Nancie M. Archin
View: Text | PDF
Research Article AIDS/HIV Cell biology Infectious disease

Effect of ligands and HIV latency-reversing agents on estrogen receptor α in CD4+ T cells

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

The estrogen receptor (ER) is hypothesized to directly influence HIV transcription and latency but is also critical for immune signaling. However, the mechanisms of action of the ER in immune cells in the context of HIV are limited, and relevant to HIV cure strategies, the influence of latency reversal agents (LRAs) on the ER pathway are unknown. We evaluated (a) the effect of estrogen (E2) on the nuclear translocation of ERα in CD4+ T cells; (b) the ability of Fulvestrant, a selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD), and ARV-471, a potent, PROteolysis TArgeting Chimera (PROTAC) selective ERα degrader to modulate ERα; and c) the effect of different classes of LRAs on ERα signaling. In contrast to what has been demonstrated in oncology, E2 did not induce ERα nuclear translocation in CD4+ T cells. Similarly, neither Fulvestrant nor ARV-471 induced degradation of ERα in CD4+ T cells. LRAs significantly downregulated ERα gene and protein expression in both PBMCs and CD4+ T cells. Collectively, our results suggest that estrogen influences on HIV transcription are not likely a consequence of canonical nuclear ERα mechanisms. The consequences of LRA downregulation of ERα, a protein important for immune signaling, warrant further investigation.

Authors

Cristina Ceriani, Priya Khetan, Anthony Abeyta-Lopez, Kena J. Lemu, Prachi Meher, Brigitte Allard, Katherine S. James, Anne-Marie W. Turner, David M. Margolis, Nancie M. Archin

×

Figure 2

LRAs significantly downregulate ERα gene expression and decrease ERα protein.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
LRAs significantly downregulate ERα gene expression and decrease ERα pro...
(A–C) ESR1 mRNA fold expression, relative to DMSO, after 6 hours and 24 hours exposure with LRAs in PBMC (A) and CD4+ T cells (B) from seronegative individuals, and CD4+ T cells and resting CD4+ T cells from PLWH (C). (D) ERα protein quantification, relative to DMSO, after 6 hours and 24 hours exposure with LRAs in CD4+ T cells from seronegative individuals. Sample sizes (n) are indicated below each group on the x axis. Each point represents an individual sample. Boxes show the interquartile range with median; whiskers span the full range. Fold change is relative to DMSO, with the horizontal line at 1 indicating baseline; values > 1 reflect upregulation, < 1 reflect downregulation. Wilcoxon test was performed by comparing each LRA treatment to the untreated control (DMSO) at the same time point. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.005, ***P < 0.001.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts