Usage Information
Abstract
BACKGROUND SARS-CoV-2 has evolved subvariants since the emergence of the Omicron variant in 2021. Whether these changes impact viral shedding and transmissibility is not known.METHODS POSITIVES is a prospective longitudinal cohort of individuals with mild SARS-CoV-2 infection. Ambulatory, immunocompetent participants who did not receive antivirals self-administered 6 anterior nasal swabs over 15 days. Samples were analyzed by qPCR to quantify viral RNA, semiquantitative viral culture to detect shedding of replication-competent virus, and whole-genome sequencing to classify subvariants. Our predictor of interest was Omicron subvariants: BA.1x, BA.2x, BA.4/5x, XBB.x, and JN.x. Outcomes included RNA levels and duration of shedding replication-competent virus. We additionally explored whether symptoms are a valid marker for ending isolation.RESULTS The median peak nasal SARS-CoV-2 RNA (6.0–6.3 log10 RNA copies/mL), median days to peak RNA (4–5 days), median days to undetectable viral RNA (12–14 days), and median days to negative viral culture (4–8 days) were similar across Omicron subvariants. Number and duration of symptoms were also similar. For all subvariants, a sizeable percentage (range 27.5%–56.0%) shed replication-competent virus after fever resolution and improvement of symptoms.CONCLUSION Despite ongoing viral evolution, key aspects of viral dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 infection, including the duration of shedding replication-competent virus, have not substantially changed across Omicron subvariants. Replication-competent shedding of these subvariants is detected for a large proportion of people who meet criteria for ending isolation.FUNDING NIH (U19 AI110818, R01 AI176287, K24 HL166024), the Massachusetts Consortium on Pathogen Readiness, and the Massachusetts General Hospital Department of Medicine.
Authors
Julie Boucau, Owen T. Glover, Caitlin Marino, Gregory E. Edelstein, Manish C. Choudhary, Yijia Li, Brooke M. Leeman, Zahra Reynolds, Karry Su, Dessie Tien, Chase B. Mandell, Eliza Passell, Andrew Alexandrescu, Emory Abar, Mamadou Barry, Dibya Ghimire, Tammy D. Vyas, Jatin M. Vyas, Jacob E. Lemieux, Jonathan Z. Li, Mark J. Siedner, Amy K. Barczak
Usage data is cumulative from September 2025 through July 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 2,913 | 76 |
| 586 | 20 | |
| Figure | 713 | 0 |
| Table | 144 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 441 | 3 |
| Citation downloads | 366 | 0 |
| Totals | 5,163 | 99 |
| Total Views | 5,262 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
