Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact

Submit a comment

Responders to low-dose ATG induce CD4+ T cell exhaustion in type 1 diabetes
Laura M. Jacobsen, Kirsten Diggins, Lori Blanchfield, James McNichols, Daniel J. Perry, Jason Brant, Xiaoru Dong, Rhonda Bacher, Vivian H. Gersuk, Desmond A. Schatz, Mark A. Atkinson, Clayton E. Mathews, Michael J. Haller, S. Alice Long, Peter S. Linsley, Todd M. Brusko
Laura M. Jacobsen, Kirsten Diggins, Lori Blanchfield, James McNichols, Daniel J. Perry, Jason Brant, Xiaoru Dong, Rhonda Bacher, Vivian H. Gersuk, Desmond A. Schatz, Mark A. Atkinson, Clayton E. Mathews, Michael J. Haller, S. Alice Long, Peter S. Linsley, Todd M. Brusko
View: Text | PDF
Clinical Research and Public Health Endocrinology Immunology

Responders to low-dose ATG induce CD4+ T cell exhaustion in type 1 diabetes

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

BACKGROUND Low-dose anti–thymocyte globulin (ATG) transiently preserves C-peptide and lowers HbA1c in individuals with recent-onset type 1 diabetes (T1D); however, the mechanisms of action and features of the response remain unclear. Here, we characterized the post hoc immunological outcomes of ATG administration and their potential use as biomarkers of metabolic response to therapy (i.e., improved preservation of endogenous insulin production).METHODS We assessed gene and protein expression, targeted gene methylation, and cytokine concentrations in peripheral blood following treatment with ATG (n = 29), ATG plus granulocyte colony–stimulating factor (ATG/G-CSF, n = 28), or placebo (n = 31).RESULTS Treatment with low-dose ATG preserved regulatory T cells (Tregs), as measured by stable methylation of FOXP3 Treg-specific demethylation region (TSDR) and increased proportions of CD4+FOXP3+ Tregs (P < 0.001) identified by flow cytometry. While treatment effects were consistent across participants, not all maintained C-peptide. Responders exhibited a transient rise in IL-6, IP-10, and TNF-α (P < 0.05 for all) 2 weeks after treatment and a durable CD4+ exhaustion phenotype (increased PD-1+KLRG1+CD57– on CD4+ T cells [P = 0.011] and PD1+CD4+ Temra MFI [P < 0.001] at 12 weeks, following ATG and ATG/G-CSF, respectively). ATG nonresponders displayed higher proportions of senescent T cells (at baseline and after treatment) and increased methylation of EOMES (i.e., less expression of this exhaustion marker).CONCLUSION Altogether in these exploratory analyses, Th1 inflammation-associated serum and CD4+ exhaustion transcript and cellular phenotyping profiles may be useful for identifying signatures of clinical response to ATG in T1D.TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02215200.FUNDING The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust (2019PG-T1D011), the NIH (R01 DK106191 Supplement, K08 DK128628), NIH TrialNet (U01 DK085461), and the NIH NIAID (P01 AI042288).

Authors

Laura M. Jacobsen, Kirsten Diggins, Lori Blanchfield, James McNichols, Daniel J. Perry, Jason Brant, Xiaoru Dong, Rhonda Bacher, Vivian H. Gersuk, Desmond A. Schatz, Mark A. Atkinson, Clayton E. Mathews, Michael J. Haller, S. Alice Long, Peter S. Linsley, Todd M. Brusko

×

Guidelines

The Editorial Board will only consider comments that are deemed relevant and of interest to readers. The Journal will not post data that have not been subjected to peer review; or a comment that is essentially a reiteration of another comment.

  • Comments appear on the Journal’s website and are linked from the original article’s web page.
  • Authors are notified by email if their comments are posted.
  • The Journal reserves the right to edit comments for length and clarity.
  • No appeals will be considered.
  • Comments are not indexed in PubMed.

Specific requirements

  • Maximum length, 400 words
  • Entered as plain text or HTML
  • Author’s name and email address, to be posted with the comment
  • Declaration of all potential conflicts of interest (even if these are not ultimately posted); see the Journal’s conflict-of-interest policy
  • Comments may not include figures
This field is required
This field is required
This field is required
This field is required
This field is required
This field is required

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts