Submit a comment
Abstract
Understanding the immune response to dengue virus (DENV) is essential for developing a dengue vaccine that is protective against all 4 DENV serotypes. We evaluated the immune response after vaccination (live attenuated tetravalent dengue vaccine TV005 or trivalent admixture) and after challenge with DEN2Δ30 (Tonga/74) to better understand the importance of homotypic immunity in vaccine protection. Significant increases in IP-10 expression were observed following receipt of either the trivalent or tetravalent vaccine. After challenge, a large increase in IP-10 expression was observed in the placebo and trivalent admixture groups but not in the tetravalent vaccine group. MCP-1, IL-1RA, and MIP-1β exhibited a similar pattern as IP-10. These results demonstrate protective effects of trivalent and tetravalent vaccines against DENV and suggest that the tetravalent vaccine has a better protective effect compared with the trivalent admixture. We also explored the postvaccination and postchallenge immune response differences between Black and White participants. White participants responded to vaccine differently than Black participants; Black participants receiving trivalent and tetravalent vaccines responded strongly and White participants responded only transiently in trivalent group. In response to challenge, White participants elicited a stronger response than Black participants. These results may explain why White participants may have a more vigorous DENV immune response than Black participants, as reported in literature.
Authors
Ruixue Hou, Lewis E. Tomalin, Jessica Pintado Silva, Seunghee Kim-Schulze, Stephen S. Whitehead, Ana Fernandez-Sesma, Anna P. Durbin, Mayte Suárez-Fariñas
Guidelines
The Editorial Board will only consider comments that are deemed relevant and of interest to readers. The Journal will not post data that have not been subjected to peer review; or a comment that is essentially a reiteration of another comment.
- Comments appear on the Journal’s website and are linked from the original article’s web page.
- Authors are notified by email if their comments are posted.
- The Journal reserves the right to edit comments for length and clarity.
- No appeals will be considered.
- Comments are not indexed in PubMed.
Specific requirements
- Maximum length, 400 words
- Entered as plain text or HTML
- Author’s name and email address, to be posted with the comment
- Declaration of all potential conflicts of interest (even if these are not ultimately posted); see the Journal’s conflict-of-interest policy
- Comments may not include figures
