Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Comparative analysis of distinct genomic landscapes in young-onset gBRCA1/2 breast cancer
Mwangala P. Akamandisa, Mingyi Xia, Wilson Cheah, Bradley Wubbenhorst, Kurt P. D'Andrea, Mengyao Fan, Jake S. Shilan, Dana Pueschl, Anupma Nayak, Hayley McKenzie, William Tapper, Ellen R. Copson, Ramsey I. Cutress, Susan M. Domchek, Diana M. Eccles, Katherine L. Nathanson
Mwangala P. Akamandisa, Mingyi Xia, Wilson Cheah, Bradley Wubbenhorst, Kurt P. D'Andrea, Mengyao Fan, Jake S. Shilan, Dana Pueschl, Anupma Nayak, Hayley McKenzie, William Tapper, Ellen R. Copson, Ramsey I. Cutress, Susan M. Domchek, Diana M. Eccles, Katherine L. Nathanson
View: Text | PDF
Research In-Press Preview Genetics Oncology

Comparative analysis of distinct genomic landscapes in young-onset gBRCA1/2 breast cancer

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant (PV) carriers have elevated young-onset breast cancer risk. To define the pretreatment genomic landscapes of young-onset gBRCA-associated breast cancer, we evaluated 136 treatment-naïve tumors diagnosed before age 50 (92.6% ≤40): gBRCA1 86(63.2%); gBRCA2 50(36.8%) in the prospective POSH study, and 66 noncarriers from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Using whole exome sequencing, we analyzed somatic variation, allele-specific loss of heterozygosity (asLOH), homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), and single-base substitution signatures (SBS). gBRCA1(93%) and gBRCA2(96%) breast cancers had high rates of asLOH, but differed significantly in average HRD scores (57.4 ± 1.3 vs 43.7 ± 1.5, P < 0.0001) and median SBS composition (%): SBS1 (aging-associated) 12.9 vs 7.3, P = 0.013; SBS18 (reactive oxygen species [ROS]-associated) 1.4 vs 0, P = 0.007; and SBS3 (HRD-associated) 27.3 vs 42.6, P = 0.002. Compared to gBRCA2 tumors, gBRCA1 tumors with asLOH were significantly enriched for alterations in Hallmark ROS, DNA repair, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition pathways. In ER-positive, HER2-negative tumors from gBRCA1/2 carriers compared to noncarriers, we found significant enrichment of RB1 (OR:6.3;95%CI:2.8–15.4;padj = 0.001), TP53 (OR:4.6;95%CI:1.9–12.1;padj = 0.017), FAT1 (OR:3.9;95%CI:1.84–8.7;padj = 0.013), and MYC (OR:4.0;95%CI:1.8–9.1;padj = 0.017) SNV/indels/CNVs, associated with CDK4/6i resistance. Together, these findings demonstrate significant differences between gBRCA1 and gBRCA2-associated breast cancers, and preexisting CDK4/6i resistance mechanisms supporting prospective trials with individualized therapy for gBRCA1 vs gBRCA2 carriers, and comparing PARPi to CDK4/6i for ER-positive gBRCA1/2-associated breast cancer.

Authors

Mwangala P. Akamandisa, Mingyi Xia, Wilson Cheah, Bradley Wubbenhorst, Kurt P. D'Andrea, Mengyao Fan, Jake S. Shilan, Dana Pueschl, Anupma Nayak, Hayley McKenzie, William Tapper, Ellen R. Copson, Ramsey I. Cutress, Susan M. Domchek, Diana M. Eccles, Katherine L. Nathanson

×
Problems with a PDF?

This file is in Adobe Acrobat (PDF) format. If you have not installed and configured the Adobe Acrobat Reader on your system.

Having trouble reading a PDF?

PDFs are designed to be printed out and read, but if you prefer to read them online, you may find it easier if you increase the view size to 125%.

Having trouble saving a PDF?

Many versions of the free Acrobat Reader do not allow Save. You must instead save the PDF from the JCI Online page you downloaded it from. PC users: Right-click on the Download link and choose the option that says something like "Save Link As...". Mac users should hold the mouse button down on the link to get these same options.

Having trouble printing a PDF?

  1. Try printing one page at a time or to a newer printer.
  2. Try saving the file to disk before printing rather than opening it "on the fly." This requires that you configure your browser to "Save" rather than "Launch Application" for the file type "application/pdf", and can usually be done in the "Helper Applications" options.
  3. Make sure you are using the latest version of Adobe's Acrobat Reader.

- Download (4.31 MB)

Advertisement

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts