Usage Information
Abstract
Functional antibody responses to malaria transmission-blocking vaccines (TBVs) are assessed using the standard membrane feeding assay (SMFA). This assay quantifies the percentage reduction of oocyst levels in mosquitoes fed gametocytes mixed with antisera/antibodies, referred to as transmission-reducing activity (TRA). As TBVs advance to large clinical trials, new scalable assays are needed to characterize vaccine responses. Here, we developed an epitope-specific competitive ELISA platform (P230Compete) for TBV candidate Pfs230D1, based on single-chain variable fragments against epitopes recognized by human monoclonal antibodies with high TRA. We quantified functional epitope-specific antibody responses (F) in phase I Pfs230D1-EPA/AS01 vaccine trial participants, using 171 serum samples collected at 2 postvaccination time points. Five antibody features were examined by P230Compete, including total IgG (reported as ELISA units, EUF), IgG subclasses (IgG1F, IgG3F, IgG4F), and bound complement factor C1q (C1qF). EUF and IgG1F demonstrated strong correlation and excellent prediction of TRA (≥80%) in logistic regression analysis (AUC of 0.81 for both assays after dose 3, and 0.80 and 0.76 after dose 4). Furthermore, combining EUF and IgG1F showed even better predictive performance at each time point. P230Compete offers a promising proxy assay to replace SMFA in late-stage Pfs230D1 trials.
Authors
Cristina A. Meehan, Matthew V. Cowles, Robert D. Morrison, Yuyan Yi, Jingwen Gu, Jen C.C. Hume, Mina P. Peyton, Issaka Sagara, Sara A. Healy, Jonathan P. Renn, Patrick E. Duffy
Usage data is cumulative from January 2026 through July 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 1,892 | 87 |
| 534 | 23 | |
| Figure | 381 | 0 |
| Table | 177 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 472 | 7 |
| Citation downloads | 331 | 0 |
| Totals | 3,787 | 117 |
| Total Views | 3,904 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
