Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Druggable genome CRISPRi screen in hydrogels reveals regulators of cortactin-driven actin remodeling promoting glioblastoma invasion
Mufeng Hu, Anna Weldy, Isabella M. Lovalvo, Erin A. Akins, Saket Jain, Alexander Chang, Ankita Sati, Meeki Lad, Austin Lui, Akhil Rajidi, Ameya Kothekar, Erika A. Ding, Juan A. Oses Prieto, Pablo Estevez, Alma L. Burlingame, Sanjay Kumar, Manish K. Aghi
Mufeng Hu, Anna Weldy, Isabella M. Lovalvo, Erin A. Akins, Saket Jain, Alexander Chang, Ankita Sati, Meeki Lad, Austin Lui, Akhil Rajidi, Ameya Kothekar, Erika A. Ding, Juan A. Oses Prieto, Pablo Estevez, Alma L. Burlingame, Sanjay Kumar, Manish K. Aghi
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Cell biology Oncology

Druggable genome CRISPRi screen in hydrogels reveals regulators of cortactin-driven actin remodeling promoting glioblastoma invasion

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

To identify therapeutic targets limiting glioblastoma invasion, we applied druggable genome CRISPRi screens and multiomic analysis to patient-derived glioblastoma cells in micro-dissectible biomimetic 3D hydrogels that permitted separation and analysis of core versus invasive fractions. Of 2,550 genes screened, 12 encoded druggable targets whose suppression limited invasion, of which AURKB (encoding aurora kinase B) and ACP1 (encoding low molecular weight protein tyrosine phosphatase, LMW-PTP) were validated in neurosphere assays and in vivo. Proximity labeling identified cortactin as a link between LMW-PTP and aurora B, and we observed that cortactin underwent serine phosphorylation by aurora B and tyrosine dephosphorylation by LMW-PTP. Targeting ACP1 or AURKB via CRISPRi or inhibitors in culture and in vivo shifted the cortactin phosphorylation balance in glioblastoma, reducing levels of cortactin and the actin-related protein 2/3 (Arp2/3) complex that mediates cortactin-induced actin stabilization, thereby reducing actin-cortactin-Arp2/3 colocalization and subsequent actin polymerization. AURKB or ACP1 targeting shifted actin from cytoplasm to the nucleus, reducing mesenchymal gene expression. Biophysical analysis implicated AURKB in glioblastoma cell adhesion and stiffness needed for initial migration and ACP1 in mechanical stress resistance required for later migration. These findings revealed a targetable axis balancing kinase and phosphatase activities to regulate actin polymerization during glioblastoma invasion.

Authors

Mufeng Hu, Anna Weldy, Isabella M. Lovalvo, Erin A. Akins, Saket Jain, Alexander Chang, Ankita Sati, Meeki Lad, Austin Lui, Akhil Rajidi, Ameya Kothekar, Erika A. Ding, Juan A. Oses Prieto, Pablo Estevez, Alma L. Burlingame, Sanjay Kumar, Manish K. Aghi

×

Figure 5

AURKB and LMW-PTP (ACP1) affect cortactin phosphorylation, altering actin polymerization, cortactin levels, and actin-cortactin overlap.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint

AURKB and LMW-PTP (ACP1) affect cortactin phosphorylation, altering act...
(A) Lysates from GBM43/sgGAL4 cells treated with AZD1152-HQPA (P =0.003) and GBM43/sgAURKB cells (P <0.0001) slowed polymerization rate versus GBM43/ sgGAL4 lysates. Time point differences occurred for GBM43/sgAURKB lysates versus GBM43/sgGAL4 lysates (red asterisks). Polymerization between lysates of GBM43/sgGAL4 cells+AZD1152-HQPA versus GBM43/sgGAL4 lysates was not significant. n = 3/group. Points, means; data shown as mean ± SEM. (B) Lysates from GBM43/sgGAL4 cells+LMW-PTP inhibitor I (P < 0.0001) and GBM43/sgACP1 cells (P < 0.0001) slowed polymerization rate versus GBM43/sgGAL4 lysates. Time point differences occurred for GBM43/sgACP1 lysates versus GBM43/sgGAL4 lysates (red asterisks). Green asterisks, polymerization differences between lysates of GBM43/sgGAL4 cells+LMW-PTP inhibitor I versus GBM43/sgGAL4 lysates. n = 3/group. Points, means; data shown as mean ± SEM. (C) GBM43/sgCTTN lysates slowed polymerization rate versus GBM43/ sgGAL4 lysates (P < 0.0001). No differences in polymerization at individual time points occurred but might eventually occur given polymerization rates. n = 3/group. (D) Reactions from A–C visualized by electron microscopy (EM), with daughter/parental filament length ratio a branching marker. Lysates from GBM43/sgAURKB (P = 0.0009), GBM43/sgACP1 (P = 0.03), and GBM43/sgCTTN (P < 0.0001) cells lowered ratio versus control GBM43/sgGAL4 cells. n = 21–37 parent filaments/group. Right: EM images with cyan parent filament and purple daughter filament; original magnification, ×6,500; scale bar: 1,000 nm for 4 main photos, 500 nm for zoomed-in photo demonstrating diminished branching. Violin plots show all points, horizontal bars at median and quartiles. (E) Targeting AURKB with CRISPRi or drug (n = 5/group) reduced cortactin levels (P < 0.0001, upper graph) and cortactin-actin overlap (P < 0.0001; lower graph) normalized to cell area. Original magnification, ×60; scale bar: 2 mm. (F) Targeting ACP1 with CRISPRi or drug (n = 5/group) reduced total (P = 0.042 CRISPRi and P = 0.045 inhibitor) and core region (P = 0.006 CRISPRi and P = 0.02 inhibitor) but not cell edge (P = 0.6–0.8) cortactin immunostaining, reduced cortactin-actin overlap (P < 0.0001 total, core, and edge) normalized to cell area. Original magnification, ×60; scale bar: 2 mm. Scatter dot plots show mean (horizontal bar) with SD (vertical bar) (E–F). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001. Linear regression for slope comparisons (A–C), t test for time point comparisons (A–C), and 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s pairwise post hoc comparisons (D–F).

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts