Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
An amphiregulin reporter mouse enables transcriptional and clonal expansion analysis of reparative lung Tregs
Lucas F. Loffredo, Katherine A. Kaiser, Adam Kornberg, Samhita Rao, Kenia de los Santos-Alexis, Arnold Han, Nicholas Arpaia
Lucas F. Loffredo, Katherine A. Kaiser, Adam Kornberg, Samhita Rao, Kenia de los Santos-Alexis, Arnold Han, Nicholas Arpaia
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Cell biology Immunology

An amphiregulin reporter mouse enables transcriptional and clonal expansion analysis of reparative lung Tregs

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Regulatory T cells (Tregs) are known to play critical roles in tissue repair via provision of growth factors, such as amphiregulin (Areg). Areg-producing Tregs have previously been difficult to study because of an inability to isolate live Areg-producing cells. In this report, we created a reporter mouse to detect Areg expression in live cells (AregThy1.1). We employed influenza A and bleomycin models of lung damage to sort Areg-producing and non-Areg-producing Tregs for transcriptomic analyses. Single-cell RNA-Seq revealed distinct subpopulations of Tregs and allowed transcriptomic comparisons of damage-induced populations. Single-cell TCR sequencing showed that Treg clonal expansion was biased toward Areg-producing Tregs and largely occurred within damage-induced subgroups. Gene module analysis revealed functional divergence of Tregs into immunosuppression-oriented and tissue repair–oriented groups, leading to identification of candidate receptors for induction of repair activity in Tregs. We tested these using an ex vivo assay for Treg-mediated tissue repair, identifying 4-1BB agonism as a mechanism for reparative activity induction. Overall, we demonstrate that the AregThy1.1 mouse is a promising tool for investigating tissue repair activity in leukocytes.

Authors

Lucas F. Loffredo, Katherine A. Kaiser, Adam Kornberg, Samhita Rao, Kenia de los Santos-Alexis, Arnold Han, Nicholas Arpaia

×

Figure 5

Analysis of Immunosuppression and Tissue repair gene modules of lung Tregs from IAV- or bleomycin-treated mice.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Analysis of Immunosuppression and Tissue repair gene modules of lung Tre...
(A) Immunosuppression and Tissue repair modules of genes (Treg-specific), established from literature. (B) Immunosuppression and Tissue repair module scores were calculated for cells in the Ccr8 subgroup of each treatment dataset, then plotted against each other. (C) Left: Subclusters with differing patterns of module expression are indicated by boxes on plot. Middle: Volcano plots of DEGs between groups indicated at left for each treatment dataset. Red dots: significantly differentially expressed (FDR adj. P value < 0.05). No fold-change cutoff. Genes encoding receptors of interest for activation of tissue repair function are indicated on graphs and in the summary on the right. (D) Protein expression assessed by flow cytometry for lung Tregs (saline or bleomycin 14–15 dpi) for each of the candidate receptors in saline (n = 4) and bleomycin mice (n = 5, separated into Thy1.1– and Thy1.1+ cells). Representative plots shown on left for combined Thy1.1–/Thy1.1+ Tregs (bleomycin 15 dpi). Gating based on individual FMO controls. LTBR1+ Tregs were gated from only CD45 i.v. negative cells for technical reasons from mouse-on-mouse staining (see Supplemental Methods). All values included from 2 experiments. Statistical analysis for comparisons between 2 groups was done using 2-tailed paired Student’s t tests, between Thy1.1– and Thy1.1+ cells from the same mice. **: 0.001 < P < 0.01, ****: P < 0.0001.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts