Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
The different natural estrogens promote endothelial healing through distinct cell targets
Morgane Davezac, Rana Zahreddine, Melissa Buscato, Natalia F. Smirnova, Chanaelle Febrissy, Henrik Laurell, Silveric Gilardi-Bresson, Marine Adlanmerini, Philippe Liere, Gilles Flouriot, Rachida Guennoun, Muriel Laffargue, Jean-Michel Foidart, Françoise Lenfant, Jean-François Arnal, Raphaël Métivier, Coralie Fontaine
Morgane Davezac, Rana Zahreddine, Melissa Buscato, Natalia F. Smirnova, Chanaelle Febrissy, Henrik Laurell, Silveric Gilardi-Bresson, Marine Adlanmerini, Philippe Liere, Gilles Flouriot, Rachida Guennoun, Muriel Laffargue, Jean-Michel Foidart, Françoise Lenfant, Jean-François Arnal, Raphaël Métivier, Coralie Fontaine
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Endocrinology Vascular biology

The different natural estrogens promote endothelial healing through distinct cell targets

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

The main estrogen, 17β-estradiol (E2), exerts several beneficial vascular actions through estrogen receptor α (ERα) in endothelial cells. However, the impact of other natural estrogens such as estriol (E3) and estetrol (E4) on arteries remains poorly described. In the present study, we report the effects of E3 and E4 on endothelial healing after carotid artery injuries in vivo. After endovascular injury, which preserves smooth muscle cells (SMCs), E2, E3, and E4 equally stimulated reendothelialization. By contrast, only E2 and E3 accelerated endothelial healing after perivascular injury that destroys both endothelial cells and SMCs, suggesting an important role of this latter cell type in E4’s action, which was confirmed using Cre/lox mice inactivating ERα in SMCs. In addition, E4 mediated its effects independently of ERα membrane-initiated signaling, in contrast with E2. Consistently, RNA sequencing analysis revealed that transcriptomic and cellular signatures in response to E4 profoundly differed from those of E2. Thus, whereas acceleration of endothelial healing by estrogens had been viewed as entirely dependent on endothelial ERα, these results highlight the very specific pharmacological profile of the natural estrogen E4, revealing the importance of dialogue between SMCs and endothelial cells in its arterial protection.

Authors

Morgane Davezac, Rana Zahreddine, Melissa Buscato, Natalia F. Smirnova, Chanaelle Febrissy, Henrik Laurell, Silveric Gilardi-Bresson, Marine Adlanmerini, Philippe Liere, Gilles Flouriot, Rachida Guennoun, Muriel Laffargue, Jean-Michel Foidart, Françoise Lenfant, Jean-François Arnal, Raphaël Métivier, Coralie Fontaine

×

Figure 4

E4 does not require membrane-initiated ERα signaling to accelerate endothelial healing and antagonizes this pathway in endothelial cells.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
E4 does not require membrane-initiated ERα signaling to accelerate endot...
Four-week-old ovariectomized (A) C451A-ERα (n = 6–7 per group) and (B) R264A-ERα (n = 7–11 per group) female mice and their respective control WT littermates were implanted with vehicle (Veh) or E4 pellets for 2 weeks and subjected to endovascular injury of the carotid artery. Schematic representation of each mouse model and quantitative analysis of reendothelialization 5 days after injury relative to day 0 are depicted. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. To test the effect of E4 treatments in each genotype, 2-way ANOVA was performed. (C) Estrogen-deprived ERα-TeloHAECs were incubated with DMSO, E2 (1 × 10–8 M), E4 (1 × 10–6 M), or a combination of E2 and E4 for 5 minutes. Proximity ligation assay for ERα-SRC interaction was performed. Interactions are represented by red dots. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (scale bars: 20 μm). (D) Quantification of the number of dots per ERα-positive cell from 1 representative experiment. The experiment was replicated 3 times. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. To test the effect of the different treatments, 1-way ANOVA was performed. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ****P < 0.0001 versus Veh-treated group. ††††P < 0.0001 for difference between E2 and E2+E4.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts