Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
The influence of ApoE4 on the clinical outcomes and pathophysiology of degenerative cervical myelopathy
Alexa Desimone, James Hong, Sydney T. Brockie, Wenru Yu, Alex M. Laliberte, Michael G. Fehlings
Alexa Desimone, James Hong, Sydney T. Brockie, Wenru Yu, Alex M. Laliberte, Michael G. Fehlings
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Aging Neuroscience

The influence of ApoE4 on the clinical outcomes and pathophysiology of degenerative cervical myelopathy

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is the most common cause of nontraumatic spinal cord injury in adults worldwide. Surgical decompression is generally effective in improving neurological outcomes and halting progression of myelopathic deterioration. However, a subset of patients experience suboptimal neurological outcomes. Given the emerging evidence that apolipoprotein E4 (ApoE4) allelic status influences neurodegenerative conditions, we examined whether the presence of the ApoE4 allele may account for the clinical heterogeneity of treatment outcomes in patients with DCM. Our results demonstrate that human ApoE4+ DCM patients have a significantly lower extent of improvement after decompression surgery. Functional analysis of our DCM mouse model in targeted-replacement mice expressing human ApoE4 revealed delayed gait recovery, forelimb grip strength, and hind limb mechanical sensitivity after decompression surgery, compared with their ApoE3 counterparts. This was accompanied by an exacerbated proinflammatory response resulting in higher concentrations of TNF-α, IL-6, CCL3, and CXCL9. At the site of injury, there was a significant decrease in gray matter area, an increase in the activation of microglia/macrophages, and increased astrogliosis after decompression surgery in the ApoE4 mice. Our study is the first to our knowledge to investigate the pathophysiological underpinnings of ApoE4 in DCM, which suggests a possible personalized medicine approach for the treatment of DCM in ApoE4 carriers.

Authors

Alexa Desimone, James Hong, Sydney T. Brockie, Wenru Yu, Alex M. Laliberte, Michael G. Fehlings

×

Figure 5

Results from forelimb grip strength before and after decompression surgery demonstrate human ApoE4–knockin mice do not improve following decompression compared with human ApoE3–knockin mice.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Results from forelimb grip strength before and after decompression surge...
(A) Representative images of DCM and sham animals prior to decompression surgery performing the wire hang test to assess forelimb grip strength. Black arrows indicate abnormal grip holding on wire grid. White arrows indicate normal grip holding on wire grid. (B) Overview of weekly behavioral test of forelimb grip strength via latency to drop (seconds) on the wire hang test in both transgenic mouse models of DCM and sham surgeries. Dashed vertical line represents the decompression time point. Comparisons were made between E3-DCM and E3-Sham (indicated with + to show significance), E4-DCM and E4-Sham (indicated with # to show significance), and E3-DCM and E4-DCM (indicated with * to show significance). (C) Detailed grip strength predecompression. E3-DCM (n = 35) and E4-DCM (n = 37) had shorter drop latencies when compared with their respective shams at 5 and 6 weeks after induction of DCM, +P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, ####P < 0.0001. Additionally, the overall group means for E3-DCM and E3-Sham were significantly different. (D) Detailed analysis of grip strength postdecompression. E3-DCM recovered to sham levels of drop latency, whereas, E4-DCM continued to be significantly more impaired when compared with E4-Sham at 1 to 3 weeks postdecompression. Overall group means were significantly different, #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.001. Additionally, overall group means of E3-DCM and E4-DCM differed significantly, *P < 0.05. All data are represented as mean ± SEM and analyzed via mixed effects model with Sidak’s post hoc correction for repeated measures.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts