Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Methods
  • Manuscript information
  • Supplemental material
  • Acknowledgments
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article
Advertisement

Research ArticleCardiologyVascular biology Open Access | 10.1172/jci.insight.202798

Mild caloric restriction accelerates atherosclerosis via dysregulated cholesterol homeostasis and lipogenesis in HCHF-fed ApoE-deficient mice

Yun Zhu,1 Yanzhe Xu,1 Gerhard Liebisch,2 and Juergen Borlak1

1Centre for Pharmacology and Toxicology, Hannover Medical School, Germany.

2Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Address for correspondence. Jürgen Borlak, Centre for Pharmacology and Toxicology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany. Phone: 49.511.532.7250; Email: Borlak.Juergen@mh-hannover.de.

Authorship note: YZ and YX contributed equally to this work.

Find articles by Zhu, Y. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Centre for Pharmacology and Toxicology, Hannover Medical School, Germany.

2Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Address for correspondence. Jürgen Borlak, Centre for Pharmacology and Toxicology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany. Phone: 49.511.532.7250; Email: Borlak.Juergen@mh-hannover.de.

Authorship note: YZ and YX contributed equally to this work.

Find articles by Xu, Y. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Centre for Pharmacology and Toxicology, Hannover Medical School, Germany.

2Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Address for correspondence. Jürgen Borlak, Centre for Pharmacology and Toxicology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany. Phone: 49.511.532.7250; Email: Borlak.Juergen@mh-hannover.de.

Authorship note: YZ and YX contributed equally to this work.

Find articles by Liebisch, G. in: PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Centre for Pharmacology and Toxicology, Hannover Medical School, Germany.

2Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Address for correspondence. Jürgen Borlak, Centre for Pharmacology and Toxicology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany. Phone: 49.511.532.7250; Email: Borlak.Juergen@mh-hannover.de.

Authorship note: YZ and YX contributed equally to this work.

Find articles by Borlak, J. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Authorship note: YZ and YX contributed equally to this work.

Published September 28, 2026 - More info

Published in Volume 11, Issue 21 on November 9, 2026
JCI Insight. 2026;11(21):e202798. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.202798.
© 2026 Zhu et al. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Published September 28, 2026 - Version history
Received: November 24, 2025; Accepted: September 14, 2026
View PDF
Abstract

Recent ACC/AHA guidelines recommend ≥ 5% weight loss over 6 months to reduce cardiovascular risk in obesity. However, some populations paradoxically exhibit increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) following weight loss. We investigated whether mild food restriction (MfR) accelerates atherogenesis through proatherogenic lipid remodeling. ApoE-deficient mice were fed Chow or a high-cholesterol/high-fat (HCHF) diet for 6 months, with MfR producing 5% lower body-weight gain. Atherosclerotic burden was quantified histologically, and hepatic lipidomes were analyzed by electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (ESI-MS/MS) and compared with plasma lipidomic profiles from patients with CVD. MfR improved insulin sensitivity by lowering blood glucose and triglycerides but increased circulating cholesterol and accelerated atherosclerosis. HCHF-fed mice developed larger, more numerous plaques with increased necrotic core formation, thinner fibrous caps, higher intima/media ratios, and inflammatory cell infiltration. Similar proatherogenic changes occurred in Chow-fed mice subjected to MfR. Mechanistically, MfR increased hepatic free cholesterol and enriched proatherogenic phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylethanolamine, lysophosphatidylcholine, sphingomyelin, ceramide, and cholesterol ester species, yielding a CERT1 score of 8.1 indicative of cardiovascular risk. These lipid alterations mirrored plasma lipidomic signatures from patients with CVD with diabetes. Collectively, our findings demonstrate that mild caloric restriction is not universally atheroprotective and can accelerate atherosclerosis in hypercholesterolemic states by disrupting cholesterol homeostasis and promoting proatherogenic lipid remodeling.

Graphical Abstract
graphical abstract
Introduction

Weight loss is widely recommended for individuals with obesity and cardiovascular disease (CVD) because it improves insulin sensitivity and other cardiometabolic risk factors (1). However, accumulating clinical evidence suggests that weight loss is not uniformly cardioprotective. In the ADVANCE trial, involving 10,081 adults with diabetes, both weight loss and weight gain were associated with increased cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality (2). Similarly, the ORIGIN trial of 12,521 individuals with prediabetes or type 2 diabetes found that weight loss independently predicted higher mortality, particularly among participants with obesity (3). These observations are consistent with the “obesity paradox” whereby patients who are overweight or have mild obesity, with established CVD, often experience lower mortality than their healthy-weight counterparts.

Weight variability may further contribute to cardiovascular risk. Repeated cycles of weight loss and regain are common after lifestyle interventions and increasingly relevant with GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy. The STEP 4 trial demonstrated substantial weight regain following semaglutide withdrawal (4), while discontinuation of GLP-1 receptor agonists has been associated with increased major cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes (5). Likewise, body-weight fluctuations independently predicted mortality and cardiovascular events in patients with established CVD (6). Although these associations may be influenced by confounding factors, including unintentional weight loss caused by underlying illness, they suggest that changes in body weight may have biological consequences beyond reductions in adiposity.

Evidence from imaging studies also supports this concept. In the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging, moderate weight loss was associated with increased carotid intima-media thickness among adults with obesity (7). Similarly, the CARDIA study linked long-term weight loss with increased coronary artery calcification despite persistent associations between body mass index and carotid intima-media thickness (8). Together, these findings raise the possibility that modest weight loss may, under certain metabolic conditions, promote rather than attenuate atherosclerotic disease.

The mechanisms linking weight loss to paradoxical increases in cardiovascular risk remain unresolved. As the liver serves as the primary regulator of cholesterol flux and lipoprotein metabolism, we postulated that mild energy restriction triggers hepatic lipid adaptations that become maladaptive when cholesterol clearance is impaired. Using ApoE-deficient mice subjected to mild dietary restriction, we integrated aortic plaque phenotyping, clinical biochemistry, and hepatic lipidomics with published plasma lipidomic signatures from obese individuals at cardiovascular risk and patients with established CVD, including those with and without diabetes mellitus. These analyses identified conserved disturbances in cholesterol homeostasis and proatherogenic lipid remodeling, revealing a mechanistic basis by which modest weight loss may accelerate atherosclerosis in hypercholesterolemic conditions.

Results

Experimental design and body weight outcomes. The experimental design is summarized in Supplemental Figure 1, and changes in body weight are shown in Figure 1A (supplemental material available online with this article; https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.202798DS1). After 6 months, ApoE-deficient mice fed the high-cholesterol, high-fat (HCHF) diet weighed 11% more than Chow-fed controls. To induce small changes in body weight, mice in the Chow_DR (dietary restriction) and HCHF_DR groups underwent daily 15-hour time-restricted feeding (5:00 p.m. to 8:00 a.m.) while maintaining ad libitum access to water. This intervention reduced body weight gain by 8.37% and 5.18% in the Chow_DR and HCHF_DR groups, respectively.

Time-restricted feeding exacerbates hypercholesterolemia and atherosclerosiFigure 1

Time-restricted feeding exacerbates hypercholesterolemia and atherosclerosis despite reducing body weight in ApoE-deficient mice. (A) Final body weight of mice after 6 months of dietary intervention (n = 14). (B) Plasma corticosterone concentrations measured at study completion. (C) Peripheral blood cell analysis, including white blood cells (WBC), red blood cells (RBC), neutrophils (NEUT), monocytes (MONO), monocyte percentage (MONO%), platelet large cell ratio (P-LCR), lymphocytes (LYMPH), and eosinophils (EO). (D) Plasma lipid and metabolic parameters, including LDL cholesterol (LDL-C), HDL cholesterol (HDL-C), total cholesterol, glucose, and triglycerides (TG) (n = 4). (E) Representative en face Oil Red O–stained aortas from each experimental group. Scale bars: 2 mm. (F) Quantification of total aortic lesion area, brachiocephalic artery plaque area (%), and brachiocephalic plaque area (mm2) (n = 4). Data are shown as mean ± SEM; violin plots display the distribution of individual values with the median and interquartile range. Statistical significance was determined using an unpaired 2-tailed Student’s t test or the 2-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann-Whitney U) test, as appropriate. Exact P values are shown in the figures, followed by superscript “a” for an unpaired, 2-tailed Student’s t-test or superscript “b” for a two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann–Whitney U) test.

The Chow and HCHF diets differed in energy density by 18.5% (367 versus 435 kcal/100 g; Supplemental Table 3). Despite the higher caloric density of the HCHF diet, HCHF-fed mice consumed less food than Chow-fed controls (2.64 versus 3.43 g/day), resulting in a 9.4% lower daily energy intake (11.52 versus 12.60 kcal/animal/day). Time-restricted feeding produced only modest additional reductions in food intake (0.10 g/day in Chow_DR and 0.15 g/day in HCHF_DR mice), corresponding to decreases in daily energy intake of 0.367 and 0.652 kcal/animal/day (2.9% and 5.5%, respectively). Over 1 month, these differences translated into cumulative energy deficits of approximately 335 and 519 kcal/kg body weight.

To determine whether time-restricted feeding induced physiological stress, we measured circulating corticosterone concentrations. Corticosterone levels were comparable between ad libitum–fed and time-restricted mice, indicating that the feeding regimen did not activate the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Interestingly, corticosterone concentrations exhibited greater interindividual variability in ad libitum–fed mice (Figure 1B).

Together, these findings indicate that the modest differences in body weight among the intervention groups were attributable to only small differences in cumulative energy intake and were not associated with activation of the physiological stress response.

Dietary restriction and HCHF feeding remodel circulating immune cell populations. Hematological analysis revealed consistent remodeling of circulating blood cell populations across the dietary intervention groups (Figure 1C). Total white blood cell counts were substantially reduced across all intervention groups, reaching statistical significance for the Chow_DR versus HCHF_DR comparison. In contrast, red blood cell counts were significantly increased in HCHF-fed compared with Chow-fed animals. Absolute neutrophil counts showed an increasing trend in Chow_DR mice and were significantly elevated following HCHF feeding. Absolute monocyte counts also tended to increase in Chow_DR- and HCHF-fed mice, although these changes did not reach statistical significance; however, monocyte frequency was significantly increased when expressed as a percentage of total leukocytes. In parallel, absolute lymphocyte counts progressively declined, with the magnitude of reduction increasing in the order Chow_DR < HCHF < HCHF_DR, indicating a shift toward neutrophil predominance. Absolute eosinophil counts were likewise reduced, reaching statistical significance in Chow_DR and HCHF mice. The platelet large cell ratio (P-LCR), an indicator of increased platelet size and activation, was elevated in all intervention groups, with the greatest increase observed in HCHF-fed mice.

Collectively, these findings demonstrate selective remodeling of circulating blood cell populations in response to dietary intervention, characterized by leukopenia, progressive lymphopenia, relative monocytosis, neutrophil predominance, and increased platelet size.

Blood biochemistry. Given the extensive characterization of plasma lipoprotein profiles in ApoE-deficient mice, circulating lipid measurements were performed in a satellite cohort only. As expected, the HCHF diet markedly increased circulating LDL cholesterol (LDL-C), with concentrations exceeding sixfold those of ad libitum Chow-fed mice (absolute difference, 6.6 mmol/L). Unexpectedly, time-restricted feeding also increased LDL-C in Chow-fed mice, resulting in a greater than 3-fold increase relative to ad libitum Chow-fed controls. LDL-C concentrations were highest in the HCHF_DR group, representing approximately 12-, 4-, and 2-fold increases compared with the Chow, Chow_DR, and HCHF groups, respectively (Figure 1D).

HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) concentrations were significantly reduced in all intervention groups. Relative to ad libitum Chow-fed controls, HDL-C declined by 41.6% in Chow_DR mice, 74.3% in HCHF-fed mice, and 67.8% in HCHF_DR mice. HDL-C concentrations did not differ significantly between the HCHF and HCHF_DR groups, indicating that time-restricted feeding did not further alter HDL-C under HCHF conditions (Figure 1D).

As expected, the HCHF diet nearly doubled circulating total cholesterol concentrations compared with ad libitum Chow-fed mice. Unexpectedly, time-restricted feeding also increased total cholesterol by approximately 2-fold in Chow-fed animals, despite the absence of a cholesterol-enriched diet. The greatest increase was observed in the HCHF_DR group, in which circulating cholesterol reached 2.7-fold above Chow-fed controls. These findings demonstrate that, even a modest reduction in energy intake markedly elevates circulating cholesterol concentrations in ApoE-deficient mice, irrespective of whether animals are maintained on Chow or HCHF diets

Time-restricted feeding also significantly reduced blood glucose concentrations, while values remained within the physiological range reported for ApoE-deficient mice, consistent with improved glucose homeostasis.

Circulating triglyceride (TG) concentrations were significantly reduced in Chow_DR mice compared with ad libitum Chow-fed controls and were similarly lower in HCHF_DR than in HCHF-fed animals. The reduction in plasma TG concentrations in Chow_DR mice is consistent with the metabolic adaptations associated with mild caloric restriction. In contrast, the lower TG concentrations observed under HCHF conditions coincided with an approximately 80-fold induction of Ces1g, a hepatic carboxylesterase implicated in intracellular TG mobilization, enhanced fatty acid oxidation, and reduced VLDL-TG secretion. However, because ApoE deficiency profoundly impairs the clearance of TG-rich lipoprotein remnants, the reduction in circulating TG likely reflects the combined effects of altered hepatic VLDL production and defective remnant metabolism rather than Ces1g induction alone.

Collectively, these findings reveal a paradoxical plasma lipid phenotype in ApoE-deficient mice in which mild dietary restriction markedly increased circulating cholesterol despite reducing blood glucose and TG concentrations. These changes point to profound remodeling of hepatic lipid metabolism and lipoprotein homeostasis, prompting further mechanistic analyses of hepatic cholesterol handling and lipid remodeling.

Dietary restriction paradoxically accelerates atherosclerotic plaque progression and destabilization. Atherosclerotic lesion burden was first quantified by en face Oil Red O staining of the entire aorta (Figure 1E). Lesion area was measured using ImageJ (NIH) in combination with the Weka machine-learning segmentation algorithm. Compared with ad libitum Chow-fed controls, all dietary interventions increased the percentage of aortic surface covered by lesions, with the greatest lesion burden observed in HCHF_DR mice, followed by HCHF-fed animals, whereas the increase in Chow_DR mice did not reach statistical significance (Figure 1F). Similar findings were obtained in the brachiocephalic artery, where plaque area was significantly increased in all intervention groups. Plaque burden was comparable between Chow_DR and HCHF mice but was significantly greater in HCHF_DR mice than in HCHF-fed animals. Quantification of absolute plaque area yielded the same pattern, increasing in the order Chow_DR < HCHF < HCHF_DR.

To independently validate these findings, atherosclerosis in the aortic arch was evaluated by H&E, Oil Red O, and Elastic van Gieson (EvG) staining (Figure 2A). Machine learning–based lesion segmentation confirmed a progressive increase in lesion area across the intervention groups (Chow_DR < HCHF < HCHF_DR) (Figure 2B). Plaque number followed the same trajectory, demonstrating a stepwise increase from Chow_DR to HCHF and HCHF_DR. Likewise, absolute plaque area progressively increased, with HCHF_DR mice exhibiting both the highest plaque burden and the largest individual lesions. These independent analyses consistently demonstrate that even modest dietary restriction unexpectedly accelerates atherosclerotic lesion development in ApoE-deficient mice, particularly in the setting of a cholesterol-rich HCHF diet.

Time-restricted feeding accelerates atherosclerotic plaque progression andFigure 2

Time-restricted feeding accelerates atherosclerotic plaque progression and promotes features of plaque vulnerability in ApoE-deficient mice. (A) Representative images of the aortic arch stained with H&E, Oil Red O, and Elastic van Gieson (EvG) from the Chow, Chow_DR, HCHF, and HCHF_DR groups. Scale bars: 500 μm. (B) Quantification of aortic arch lesion area (%), plaque number, and total plaque area (n = 9). (C) Representative H&E-stained cross-sections of the aortic root. Lower panels show higher-magnification views of the boxed regions. Scale bars: 200 μm (upper panels) and 50 μm (lower panels). (D) Representative H&E-stained section of the brachiocephalic artery illustrating measurement of fibrous cap thickness (black dashed line), delineation of the necrotic core (red dashed outline), and measurement of intimal (I) and medial (M) thicknesses used to calculate the intima/media ratio (IMR). Scale bar: 50 μm. (E) Quantification of fibrous cap thickness, necrotic core area (expressed as a percentage of total plaque area), and IMR in brachiocephalic artery lesions (n = 9). (F) Representative H&E-stained brachiocephalic artery lesion showing inflammatory cell infiltration. The right panel shows a higher-magnification view of the boxed region; arrows indicate foamy macrophages within the lesion. Scale bars: 50 μm. (G) Quantification of inflammatory cell density in brachiocephalic artery lesions, expressed as inflammatory cells per 1,000 μm2 (n = 9). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined using an unpaired 2-tailed Student’s t test or the 2-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann-Whitney U) test, as appropriate. Exact P values are shown in the figures, followed by superscript “a” for an unpaired, 2-tailed Student’s t-test or superscript “b” for a two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann–Whitney U) test.

To determine whether the increased plaque burden was accompanied by features of plaque progression, lesion morphology was examined in the aortic root, aortic arch, and brachiocephalic artery (Figure 2, C–E). Quantitative morphometric analyses were performed in the brachiocephalic artery because of its susceptibility to disturbed flow and its propensity to develop advanced fibroatheromatous lesions that closely resemble human atherosclerosis. Necrotic core area increased progressively in the order Chow_DR < HCHF < HCHF_DR, whereas fibrous cap thickness decreased accordingly, consistent with the development of increasingly vulnerable plaques. The intima/media ratio was significantly increased in all intervention groups, although among the intervention groups, only the difference between HCHF and HCHF_DR reached statistical significance.

To assess vascular inflammation, immune cell infiltration within brachiocephalic plaques was quantified using QuPath image analysis (Figure 2, F and G). Immune cell density was significantly increased in HCHF- and HCHF_DR-fed mice compared with Chow-fed controls, whereas Chow_DR mice exhibited only a modest, statistically nonsignificant increase (3.95 versus 4.17 cells/1,000 μm2).

Collectively, these findings demonstrate that mild dietary restriction paradoxically aggravates atherosclerosis in ApoE-deficient mice. Beyond increasing lesion burden, dietary restriction promotes morphological hallmarks of advanced and vulnerable plaques, including expansion of the necrotic core, thinning of the fibrous cap, enhanced immune cell infiltration, and adverse vascular remodeling. These effects are most pronounced when dietary restriction is combined with HCHF feeding.

Dietary restriction promotes hepatic proatherogenic lipid remodeling. To define the effects of dietary intervention on hepatic lipid homeostasis, we performed partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA). The PLS-DA score plot revealed close clustering of the Chow and Chow_DR groups, whereas HCHF- and HCHF_DR-fed mice formed distinct clusters, indicating marked remodeling of the hepatic lipidome in response to the HCHF diet (Figure 3A). Orthogonal PLS-DA (OPLS-DA) further resolved all pairwise comparisons, demonstrating distinct diet-specific lipidomic signatures (Figure 3B). To identify the lipid species driving group separation, variable importance in projection (VIP) scores were calculated, and lipids with VIP > 1.0 and P < 0.05 were considered discriminatory. Heatmaps of these lipids are shown in Figure 3C and comprise 70, 73, and 42 species in the HCHF versus Chow, HCHF_DR versus Chow_DR, and HCHF_DR versus HCHF comparisons, respectively. Hierarchical clustering robustly segregated samples according to dietary intervention, confirming highly reproducible remodeling of the hepatic lipidome. Discriminatory lipids exhibited reciprocal regulation between dietary groups and included multiple phospholipid classes, notably phosphatidylcholines (PC), phosphatidylethanolamines (PE), phosphatidylserines (PS), lysophosphatidylcholines (LPC), sphingomyelins (SM), cholesteryl esters (CE), and their corresponding fatty acyl species. Note that all 42 discriminatory lipid species identified in the HCHF_DR versus HCHF comparison were increased, indicating a coordinated hepatic lipid remodeling response to dietary restriction superimposed on HCHF feeding. To further identify the lipid species contributing most strongly to group discrimination, S-plots were generated from the OPLS-DA models (Figure 3D). These analyses identified discriminatory lipids across all major lipid classes and served as the basis for subsequent analyses of lipid species associated with the proatherogenic phenotype induced by dietary restriction.

Time-restricted feeding induces hepatic lipidomic remodeling and alters choFigure 3

Time-restricted feeding induces hepatic lipidomic remodeling and alters cholesterol and bile acid metabolism. (A) Partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) score plot of hepatic lipidomic profiles demonstrating separation among the Chow, Chow_DR, HCHF, and HCHF_DR groups. (B) Orthogonal PLS-DA (OPLS-DA) score plots for pairwise comparisons between HCHF and Chow, HCHF_DR and Chow_DR, and HCHF_DR, and HCHF. (C) Heatmaps of differentially abundant hepatic lipid species identified in the indicated pairwise comparisons. (D) OPLS-DA S-plots highlighting discriminant lipid species enriched (red) or depleted (blue) between groups. (E) Hepatic concentrations of total cholesterol, free cholesterol, and total bile acids (BA), together with the total cholesterol/BA and free cholesterol/BA ratios (n = 10). (F) Relative hepatic mRNA expression levels of genes involved in cholesterol esterification and bile acid synthesis (Acat1, Acat2, Ces1g, Cyp7a1, and Cyp8b1) (n = 12). (G) Biliary concentrations of total cholesterol, free cholesterol, and total BA, together with the total cholesterol/BA and free cholesterol/BA ratios (n = 10). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined using an unpaired 2-tailed Student’s t test or the 2-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann-Whitney U) test, as appropriate. Exact P values are shown in the figures, followed by superscript “a” for an unpaired, 2-tailed Student’s t-test or superscript “b” for a two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann–Whitney U) test.

Cholesterol homeostasis. Bar charts in Figure 3, E and G, present quantitative analyses of total cholesterol, free cholesterol, total bile acids (BA), and the cholesterol/BA ratio in liver tissue and gallbladder bile.

Feeding mice a HCHF diet resulted in a 12.2% increase in total hepatic cholesterol compared with Chow-fed controls (2.78 mg/g versus 3.12 mg/g liver weight; Figure 3E). Although total cholesterol levels did not differ significantly between the ad libitum Chow and HCHF groups, free cholesterol was markedly elevated in HCHF-fed mice, showing a 65.5% increase (P = 0.00191). These findings closely parallel observations in human liver, where free cholesterol levels are elevated by 37.7% and 70.6% in MAFL and MASH cases, respectively (9).

Strikingly, mild dietary restriction produced distinct effects on hepatic cholesterol content depending on dietary background. In the Chow_DR group, total hepatic cholesterol decreased by 15.6% relative to ad libitum Chow-fed controls, though this reduction was not statistically significant. In contrast, mild dietary restriction in HCHF-fed mice (HCHF_DR group) led to a further 66.7% increase in free cholesterol, exceeding levels observed in the unrestricted HCHF group (P = 0.000276). Collectively, these data indicate that dietary restriction modulates hepatic cholesterol metabolism in a diet-dependent manner, with free cholesterol levels increasing nearly 3-fold in the HCHF_DR group compared with Chow-fed controls.

We next examined the hepatic expression of enzymes regulating cholesterol esterification, mobilization, and catabolism in ApoE-deficient mice. HCHF feeding significantly increased the expression of both Acat1 and Acat2 (Figure 3F). Although both enzymes catalyze the esterification of free cholesterol to CE, ACAT1 primarily mediates intracellular cholesterol sequestration to protect cells from free cholesterol–induced lipotoxicity, whereas ACAT2 is largely restricted to hepatocytes and enterocytes, where it generates CE for incorporation into ApoB-containing lipoproteins. Interestingly, time-restricted feeding further increased Acat1 expression under both dietary conditions, whereas Acat2 transcript abundance remained unchanged, suggesting preferential activation of intracellular cholesterol storage pathways rather than enhanced lipoprotein assembly.

Given the marked accumulation of hepatic free cholesterol, we next assessed the expression of Ces1g, a hepatic carboxylesterase that hydrolyses intracellular CE to release free cholesterol. Under Chow-fed conditions, time-restricted feeding increased Ces1g expression by approximately 3-fold (Figure 3F). HCHF feeding induced a striking ~80-fold increase in Ces1g transcript abundance, consistent with a robust adaptive response to hepatic cholesterol overload, whereas time-restricted feeding significantly attenuated this induction. As Ces1g is predominantly expressed in hepatocytes, its induction is likely to enhance the mobilization of stored CE, thereby increasing the availability of free cholesterol for downstream metabolic pathways.

To determine whether this mobilized cholesterol was directed toward BA synthesis, we examined the expression of Cyp7a1 and Cyp8b1, 2 key enzymes of the classical BA biosynthetic pathway. Both genes were robustly induced following HCHF feeding (approximately 50- and 11-fold, respectively) consistent with activation of hepatic cholesterol catabolism (Figure 3F), whereas time-restricted feeding did not further alter their expression.

Collectively, these findings demonstrate coordinated remodeling of hepatic cholesterol metabolism in response to dietary cholesterol overload. The concomitant induction of Acat1 and Acat2 is consistent with enhanced esterification and temporary sequestration of excess free cholesterol, while the marked induction of Ces1g suggests increased mobilization of CE stores. Together with the upregulation of Cyp7a1 and Cyp8b1, these data support increased hepatic cholesterol turnover, whereby excess cholesterol is dynamically esterified, remobilized, and directed toward BA synthesis. Consistent with this interpretation, hepatic BA content tended to be higher in HCHF-fed mice and was greatest in the time-restricted feeding group, although this difference did not reach statistical significance (Figure 3E).

Given the marked differences in dietary cholesterol intake and the central role of cholesterol as the precursor for BA synthesis, we next examined the hepatic cholesterol/BA ratio. Compared with Chow-fed controls, the total cholesterol/BA ratio was reduced by 23.7%, 15.2%, and 4.0% in the HCHF, Chow_DR, and HCHF_DR groups, respectively, although these differences did not reach statistical significance (Figure 3E). In contrast, the free cholesterol/BA ratio was significantly increased in the HCHF_DR group, indicating a disproportionate accumulation of hepatic free cholesterol relative to BA. This finding occurred despite a 49% increase in total hepatic cholesterol content in HCHF_DR mice, suggesting that the marked expansion of the hepatic cholesterol pool was not accompanied by a proportional increase in BA production. Collectively, these data indicate that time-restricted feeding under HCHF conditions alters hepatic cholesterol homeostasis, resulting in preferential accumulation of free cholesterol relative to its catabolism.

We next characterized the lipid composition of gallbladder bile (Figure 3G). Total biliary cholesterol concentrations were comparable between Chow and Chow_DR mice. In contrast, HCHF feeding nearly doubled biliary cholesterol, and dietary restriction in HCHF-fed mice produced a further 27% increase, although this difference did not reach statistical significance. Intriguingly, despite the HCHF diet contained substantially more cholesterol than the standard Chow diet (Supplemental Table 1), biliary cholesterol increased by only 2-fold, suggesting that hepatobiliary cholesterol secretion approaches saturation under conditions of chronic dietary cholesterol excess.

A similar pattern was observed for free cholesterol. Levels remained unchanged between Chow and Chow_DR mice, whereas HCHF feeding resulted in a nearly 2-fold increase that approached nearly statistical significance (P = 0.063). Dietary restriction further increased free cholesterol by 24% in HCHF-fed mice, although this effect likewise did not reach statistical significance.

Because excess hepatic cholesterol is normally converted into BA, we next quantified total biliary BA. Unexpectedly, BA concentrations tended to decline following HCHF feeding, decreasing by 10% in HCHF mice and by 23% in HCHF_DR mice, although neither change reached statistical significance. As a result, the cholesterol/BA ratio was significantly increased in HCHF-fed mice, irrespective of whether total or free cholesterol was used for the calculation, with the highest ratios observed in HCHF_DR mice. These findings indicate that dietary cholesterol loading disproportionately increases biliary cholesterol relative to BA secretion, an imbalance that is further accentuated by dietary restriction.

Dietary restriction exacerbates proatherogenic cholesterol ester remodeling in liver and bile. Previous studies identified distinct plasma CE species as strong predictors of cardiometabolic risk in large cohorts of patients with CVD and type 2 diabetes (10, 11). Building on these observations, we determined the hepatic and biliary CE composition with particular emphasis on clinically relevant atherogenic CE species. Although total hepatic CE content remained unchanged across dietary groups (Figure 4A), analysis at the molecular species level revealed marked diet-dependent remodeling.

Time-restricted feeding remodels hepatic and biliary cholesteryl ester specFigure 4

Time-restricted feeding remodels hepatic and biliary cholesteryl ester species. (A) Circular bubble heatmaps showing the abundance and composition of CE species in liver (left) and bile (right). Bubble size represents mean CE abundance (pmol/mg tissue for liver and nmol/mL for bile), and red arcs indicate the significance of group differences (−log10-transformed P values). (B) Distribution of hepatic CE subclasses containing saturated fatty acids (SFAs), monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs), and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs). (C) Hepatic abundance of selected atherogenic CE species. (D) Hepatic abundance of selected atheroprotective CE species. (E) Total CE abundance and subclass distribution (SFA-, MUFA-, and PUFA-containing CE species) in bile. (F) Biliary abundance of selected atherogenic CE species. (G) Biliary abundance of selected atheroprotective CE species. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 10). Statistical significance was determined using an unpaired 2-tailed Student’s t test or the 2-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann-Whitney U) test, as appropriate. Exact P values are shown in the figures, followed by superscript “a” for an unpaired, 2-tailed Student’s t-test or superscript “b” for a two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann–Whitney U) test.

In the liver, cholesterol esters containing saturated fatty acids (SFAs) and monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs) were significantly more abundant in Chow_DR than in HCHF_DR mice, whereas polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA)-containing CEs were markedly reduced by the HCHF diet, an effect that was not corrected by mild dietary restriction (Figure 4B). At the individual species level, the HCHF diet increased several CE species previously associated with atherosclerotic risk, including CE(14:0), CE(15:0), CE(16:1), CE(20:1), CE(20:2), CE(20:3), and CE(22:1) (Figure 4C). Mild dietary restriction further accentuated this proatherogenic profile by increasing CE(15:0) and CE(16:1), with a similar trend observed for CE(20:0) (P = 0.10). In contrast, the antiatherogenic species CE(18:2) was significantly depleted by the HCHF diet and remained suppressed despite dietary restriction (Figure 4D).

A comparable remodeling was observed in bile (Figure 4A). Mild dietary restriction produced a modest, nonsignificant increase in SFA-containing CEs, whereas the HCHF diet significantly increased MUFA- and PUFA-containing CE species (Figure 4E). Individual proatherogenic CE species, including CE(14:0), CE(16:1), CE(20:1), and CE(20:3), were significantly enriched following HCHF feeding (Figure 4F). Dietary restriction further increased CE(16:1), CE(20:0), CE(20:2), and CE(22:1), although these changes did not reach statistical significance. In contrast to the liver, biliary CE(18:2) showed a modest but nonsignificant increase in HCHF-fed mice (Figure 4G).

Collectively, these findings demonstrate that the HCHF diet profoundly remodels hepatic and biliary cholesterol ester composition toward a proatherogenic molecular signature. Mild dietary restriction failed to restore this lipid imbalance and, instead, further amplified several proatherogenic CE species, indicating that even modest energy restriction can aggravate cholesterol ester remodeling under conditions of dietary lipid excess.

HCHF feeding disrupts hepatobiliary phospholipid homeostasis. Hepatic and biliary phospholipid composition is summarized in Figure 5. Total hepatic phospholipid content was significantly reduced in HCHF-fed mice compared with Chow-fed controls (P = 0.000143). Time restricted feeding restored hepatic phospholipid levels in HCHF_DR mice to near-control values but had no effect in Chow-fed animals (Figure 5A), indicating that this response is specific to the HCHF dietary context.

Time-restricted feeding alters phospholipid abundance and class compositionFigure 5

Time-restricted feeding alters phospholipid abundance and class composition. (A and B) Total hepatic phospholipid abundance and relative abundance of major phospholipid classes (PC, PE, LPC, SM, Cer, PS, and PE[P]). (C and D) Total biliary phospholipid abundance and relative abundance of major phospholipid classes. Pie charts display average class composition. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 10). Statistical significance was determined using an unpaired 2-tailed Student’s t test or the 2-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann-Whitney U) test, as appropriate. Exact P values are shown in the figures, followed by superscript “a” for an unpaired, 2-tailed Student’s t-test or superscript “b” for a two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann–Whitney U) test.

The relative distribution of hepatic phospholipid classes is illustrated in the pie charts (Figure 5A), with quantitative analyses shown in Figure 5B. The 2 major phospholipid classes, PC and PE, were unchanged across all experimental groups. In contrast, lysophospholipids were reduced following HCHF feeding, with the largest differences observed between Chow_DR and HCHF_DR mice. HCHF feeding also altered sphingolipid metabolism. Hepatic SM abundance increased by approximately 37%, reaching statistical significance only in HCHF_DR mice. Likewise, ceramide levels were elevated by approximately 80% in response to the HCHF diet; however, this increase was significantly attenuated by mild dietary restriction in HCHF_DR animals. In Chow-fed mice, dietary restriction significantly reduced PS while increasing PE plasmalogens (PE[P]) relative to ad libitum–fed controls.

The phospholipid composition of gallbladder bile exhibited a distinct response to diet and dietary restriction (Figure 5C), with quantitative analyses shown in Figure 5D. Total phospholipid content and PC abundance remained unchanged across all experimental groups. Although PE declined from 20.1% to 14.9% in Chow_DR mice, this difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.118). Moreover, because PE abundance was comparable between Chow- and HCHF-fed mice, the statistical difference observed between Chow_DR and HCHF_DR is unlikely to represent a biologically meaningful dietary effect.

Time-restricted feeding consistently increased LPC in both dietary groups. In contrast, PS displayed a diet-dependent response, decreasing by 47% in HCHF-fed mice relative to Chow controls, followed by a 30% increase in HCHF_DR animals, although neither change reached statistical significance. Biliary SM also increased in response to dietary restriction and was elevated by 24% in HCHF-fed mice. Ceramide exhibited the most pronounced diet-dependent response, decreasing by 48% in Chow-fed mice subjected to dietary restriction but increasing by 60% in HCHF_DR animals. Finally, PE plasmalogens were significantly reduced by both HCHF feeding and dietary restriction in Chow-fed mice but were restored to near Chow control levels in HCHF_DR animals.

Collectively, these findings demonstrate that HCHF feeding induces pronounced remodeling of the hepatic phospholipidome, characterized by depletion of total phospholipids and enrichment of ceramide. Time restricted feeding selectively restored total hepatic phospholipid content in HCHF-fed mice but failed to normalize the accompanying shift toward bioactive sphingolipids. In contrast, biliary phospholipid composition remained largely preserved, with only selective alterations in SM, ceramide, and plasmalogens, underscoring distinct regulatory mechanisms governing hepatic and biliary phospholipid homeostasis.

Dietary restriction amplifies SCD1-dependent PC remodeling in HCHF-fed mice. Figure 6A summarizes the hepatic PC acyl chain landscape. Bubble size denotes the relative abundance of individual PC species, whereas the central heatmap illustrates the statistical significance of group comparisons, with color intensity corresponding to the –log10(P value) (range, P < 0.05 to P < 1 × 10–11). Only PC species exhibiting significant differences in at least 1 dietary comparison are shown. Dietary groups are color-coded as Chow (pink), Chow_DR (blue), HCHF (yellow), and HCHF_DR (green).

Time-restricted feeding remodels hepatic phosphatidylcholine species.Figure 6

Time-restricted feeding remodels hepatic phosphatidylcholine species. (A) Circular bubble heatmap displaying the distribution and concentrations (pmol/mg tissue) hepatic PC species across diet groups. Bubble size represents average concentration (pmol/mg); red arcs indicate –log10-transformed P values from group comparisons. (B) Total abundance of SFA-, MUFA-, and PUFA-containing PC species. (C) Quantification of proatherogenic PC species in the liver. (D) Quantification of antiatherogenic PC species in the liver. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 10). Statistical significance was determined using an unpaired 2-tailed Student’s t test or the 2-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann-Whitney U) test, as appropriate. Exact P values are shown in the figures, followed by superscript “a” for an unpaired, 2-tailed Student’s t-test or superscript “b” for a two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann–Whitney U) test.

Total hepatic PC abundance was unchanged between Chow and Chow_DR mice (Figure 6A). In contrast, HCHF feeding significantly reduced total hepatic PC levels relative to Chow-fed controls. Mild dietary restriction had no effect in Chow-fed mice but restored hepatic PC abundance in HCHF_DR animals to levels comparable with those of Chow-fed controls.

To determine whether these changes reflected remodeling of PC acyl chain composition, PC species were grouped according to the class of their esterified fatty acids (Figure 6B). Despite the HCHF diet being enriched in SFAs, hepatic PC species containing SFA acyl chains were significantly reduced in HCHF-fed mice. Mild dietary restriction largely restored SFA-containing PC species to levels observed in Chow-fed controls. In contrast, MUFA-containing PC species were significantly increased by HCHF feeding and further enriched following dietary restriction, indicating a marked shift in PC composition from saturated toward monounsaturated acyl chains.

This remodeling closely paralleled the expression of stearoyl-CoA desaturase-1 (SCD1), the rate-limiting enzyme that converts saturated fatty acids into monounsaturated fatty acids. Scd1 expression was significantly reduced in Chow_DR mice but increased more than ninefold in HCHF-fed ApoE-deficient mice relative to Chow-fed controls. Dietary restriction superimposed on the HCHF diet triggered an even more pronounced transcriptional response, with Scd1 expression ranging from 12- to 240-fold (mean, 74-fold), representing the strongest induction of any lipid metabolic gene observed in this study. These transcriptional changes provide a mechanistic basis for the preferential incorporation of MUFAs into hepatic PC under conditions of dietary lipid excess and mild energy restriction.

Consistent with the low PUFA content of the milk fat–based HCHF diet, PC-bound PUFAs were markedly depleted, decreasing by approximately 50% in HCHF-fed mice and by 36% in HCHF_DR animals relative to Chow-fed controls.

Collectively, these findings demonstrate that HCHF feeding profoundly reprograms the hepatic PC acyl chain landscape through an SCD1-driven shift from saturated to monounsaturated species while depleting PUFA-containing PC, a remodeling that is further reinforced by mild dietary restriction

Dietary lipid excess remodels the hepatic phosphatidylcholineome toward an atherogenic signature. Independent lipidomic studies established strong associations between PC composition in liver, adipose tissue, and plasma and the severity of MASLD, obesity, and CVD (12–16). Building on these findings, we interrogated hepatic PC species with established pro- and antiatherogenic properties using a consensus panel derived from 4 independent clinical lipidomic studies encompassing nearly 500 patients with CVD.

As shown in Figure 6C and Supplemental Table 5, HCHF feeding markedly increased the abundance of several PC species previously associated with atherosclerotic risk, including PC(30:0), PC(32:1), PC(34:1), PC(36:1), PC(38:0), PC(O 32:0), PC(O 32:1), PC(O 34:0), and PC(O 34:1). Mild dietary restriction further augmented the accumulation of multiple proatherogenic species, most notably PC(32:1), PC(34:1), PC(36:1), PC(38:0), PC(O 32:0), PC(O 32:1), and PC(O 34:1), demonstrating that modest energy restriction unexpectedly intensified the hepatic enrichment of atherogenic PC molecular species.

We next examined PC species consistently associated with favorable cardiovascular outcomes in patients with coronary heart disease and coronary artery disease (16). HCHF feeding significantly depleted several cardioprotective PC species, including PC(36:4), PC(36:5), PC(38:4), PC(38:5), PC(38:6), PC(38:7), and PC(40:6) (Figure 6D and Supplemental Table 6), indicating a selective loss of phospholipids linked to cardiovascular protection. Mild dietary restriction partially modified this response by increasing PC(32:2) and PC(38:3) by 76% and 25%, respectively, although the overall cardioprotective PC signature remained markedly diminished.

To determine whether these changes extended to the hepatobiliary compartment, we quantified PC species in gallbladder bile (Supplemental Figure 2). Consistent with the hepatic lipidome, biliary PC species containing saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids were significantly enriched, whereas PUFA-containing species were markedly depleted. The HCHF diet significantly increased multiple proatherogenic PC species, including PC(30:0), PC(32:1), PC(34:1), PC(36:1), PC(38:0), PC(O 34:0), PC(O 34:1), and PC(O 38:5), and dietary restriction further enhanced the accumulation of PC(34:1) (Supplemental Table 7). Among cardioprotective species, PC(32:2), PC(38:3), and PC(40:7) were increased, whereas PC(36:4) and PC(38:4) were reduced (Supplemental Table 8).

Collectively, these findings demonstrate that HCHF feeding profoundly remodels the hepatic and biliary PC landscape, characterized by depletion of total PC, selective enrichment of proatherogenic molecular species, and loss of cardioprotective PC species. Time-restricted feeding failed to reverse this atherogenic remodeling and instead further amplified the accumulation of several high-risk PC species.

Dietary lipid excess selectively enriches proatherogenic PE and LPC molecular species. PE, the second-most abundant phospholipid class in the liver (Figure 7A), exhibited a modest 16% reduction following HCHF feeding, although this change did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.10). Mild dietary restriction restored total hepatic PE abundance to levels comparable with Chow-fed controls.

Time-restricted feeding differentially remodels hepatic phosphatidylethanolFigure 7

Time-restricted feeding differentially remodels hepatic phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) and lysophosphatidylcholine species (LPC). (A) Circular bubble heatmap displaying the concentrations (pmol/mg tissue) of PE species in the liver across different dietary groups. Bubble size indicates average concentration (pmol/mg); red arcs denote –log10 transformed P values from group comparisons. (B) Total hepatic phosphatidylethanolamine levels of saturated (SFA), monounsaturated (MUFA), and polyunsaturated (PUFA) PE species. (C) Quantification of proatherogenic PE species in the liver. (D) Quantification of antiatherogenic PE species in the liver. (E) Circular bubble heatmap displaying the concentrations (pmol/mg tissue) of LPC species in the liver across different dietary groups. Bubble size indicates average concentration (pmol/mg); red arcs denote –log10 transformed P values from group comparisons. (F) Total hepatic lysophosphatidylcholine levels of saturated (SFA), monounsaturated (MUFA), and polyunsaturated (PUFA) LPC species. (G) Quantification of proatherogenic LPC species in the liver. (H) Quantification of antiatherogenic LPC species in the liver. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 10). Statistical significance was determined using an unpaired 2-tailed Student’s t test or the 2-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann-Whitney U) test, as appropriate. Exact P values are shown in the figures, followed by superscript “a” for an unpaired, 2-tailed Student’s t-test or superscript “b” for a two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann–Whitney U) test.

To determine whether HCHF feeding altered PE molecular composition, PE species were grouped according to their esterified fatty acids (Figure 7B). SFA-containing PE species remained unchanged across all dietary groups. In contrast, MUFA-containing PE species were significantly enriched in HCHF-fed mice and increased further following dietary restriction. Conversely, PUFA-containing PE species were significantly depleted in both HCHF and HCHF_DR mice. Together, these findings demonstrate a diet-induced remodeling of the hepatic PE lipidome characterized by replacement of PUFA-containing species with MUFA-containing species, a trend that was further accentuated by dietary restriction (P = 0.062).

We next examined individual PE species previously associated with increased cardiovascular risk. HCHF feeding significantly increased several proatherogenic PE species, including PE(32:1), PE(34:1), PE(36:1), PE(36:5), and PE(38:2), but PE(O 36:2) did not reach statistical significance (Figure 7C). Mild dietary restriction further increased these species, although statistical significance was reached only for PE(32:1). In contrast, among PE species associated with favorable cardiovascular outcomes, only PE(36:6) was significantly increased in HCHF_DR mice relative to Chow_DR animals (Figure 7D).

The phospholipid composition of gallbladder bile showed a partially distinct pattern (Supplemental Figure 3). Total biliary PE content remained unchanged across all dietary groups. However, MUFA-containing PE species were significantly enriched following HCHF feeding, whereas PUFA-containing PE species were largely unaffected. At the molecular level, several proatherogenic PE species, including PE(32:1), PE(34:1), PE(36:5), PE(38:2), and PE(O 36:2), were significantly increased in bile from HCHF-fed mice, indicating that the proatherogenic remodeling observed in liver extends to the hepatobiliary compartment.

We next analyzed LPC, a bioactive phospholipid implicated in vascular inflammation and atherosclerosis. Total hepatic LPC abundance declined by 33% following HCHF feeding (Figure 7E). Despite this overall reduction, LPC composition underwent marked remodeling, with a shift from PUFA-containing toward MUFA-containing species (Figure 7F). Consistent with this pattern, the proatherogenic LPC(16:1) was significantly increased in HCHF_DR mice, whereas LPC(22:4) and LPC(22:5) were significantly reduced (Figure 7G). Several LPC species associated with cardiovascular protection, including LPC(16:0), LPC(18:0), LPC(18:2), and LPC(20:4), were also significantly depleted, while LPC(18:1) was increased (Figure 7H). Thus, despite a reduction in total hepatic LPC content, HCHF feeding selectively enriched LPC species linked to increased cardiovascular risk.

Analysis of gallbladder bile revealed comparable remodeling of LPC species (Supplemental Figure 4). Although total biliary LPC levels increased by more than 40% following dietary restriction, this change did not reach statistical significance. Similar to the liver, biliary LPC composition shifted from PUFA-containing toward MUFA-containing species. Moreover, the proatherogenic LPC(16:1) was significantly increased in HCHF-fed mice, whereas the cardioprotective LPC(18:2) was significantly reduced.

Collectively, these findings demonstrate that HCHF feeding coordinately remodels hepatic and biliary PE and LPC lipidomes toward a proatherogenic molecular signature characterized by enrichment of MUFA-containing and disease-associated lipid species and depletion of cardioprotective PUFA-containing phospholipids. Mild dietary restriction failed to reverse these changes and, for several lipid species, further accentuated the proatherogenic remodeling.

HCHF feeding and dietary restriction remodel hepatic sphingolipids toward an atherogenic profile. We next quantified hepatic SM and ceramide species, 2 sphingolipid classes with established roles in atherosclerosis and CVD (Figure 8A). Total hepatic SM abundance was significantly reduced following HCHF feeding but was restored to levels comparable to Chow-fed controls by time restricted feeding. Unlike the glycerophospholipid classes, SM species containing saturated (SFA), monounsaturated (MUFA), and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) were all significantly depleted in HCHF-fed mice. Note dietary restriction completely normalized these reductions (Figure 8B).

Time-restricted feeding remodels hepatic sphingomyelin and ceramide speciesFigure 8

Time-restricted feeding remodels hepatic sphingomyelin and ceramide species. (A) Circular bubble heatmaps illustrating the composition and concentrations (pmol/mg tissue) of sphingomyelin species in the liver (left panel) and ceramides (right panel); red arcs denote –log10 transformed P values for group comparisons. (B) Total hepatic sphingomyelin levels of saturated (SFA), monounsaturated (MUFA), and polyunsaturated (PUFA) SM species. (C) Quantification of proatherogenic SM species in the liver. (D) Quantification of antiatherogenic SM species in the liver. (E) Total hepatic levels of Cer species grouped by saturation type. (F) Quantification of proatherogenic Cer species in the liver. (G) Quantification of antiatherogenic Cer species in the liver. (H) Ceramide risk score of CERT1 in the liver. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 10). Statistical significance was determined using an unpaired 2-tailed Student’s t test or the 2-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann-Whitney U) test, as appropriate. Exact P values are shown in the figures, followed by superscript “a” for an unpaired, 2-tailed Student’s t-test or superscript “b” for a two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann–Whitney U) test.

Analysis of individual SM species revealed selective remodeling of molecular species with established cardiovascular relevance. The proatherogenic species SM(16:0) and SM(24:1) were significantly enriched in HCHF_DR mice (Figure 8C). At the same time, dietary restriction increased the cardioprotective species SM(23:0) and SM(23:1), whereas SM(24:0), another cardioprotective species, was significantly reduced (Figure 8D), indicating a mixed effect of dietary restriction on the hepatic SM profile.

In contrast to SM, total hepatic ceramide content increased by approximately 30% following HCHF feeding and remained elevated despite dietary restriction (Figure 8A). Although ceramides containing SFA acyl chains increased modestly (approximately 15%) in both dietary restriction groups, these changes did not reach statistical significance. By comparison, MUFA-containing ceramides increased by approximately 38% in both HCHF-fed groups (Figure 8E). At the molecular level, HCHF feeding significantly increased the proatherogenic ceramide species Cer(16:0), Cer(18:0), and Cer(24:1), with no further effect of dietary restriction (Figure 8F). Among ceramide species associated with lower cardiovascular risk, Cer(23:0) was significantly increased, whereas Cer(24:0) was significantly reduced following HCHF feeding; both responses were unaffected by dietary restriction (Figure 8G).

To integrate these changes into a clinically relevant metric, we calculated the CERT1 ceramide risk score (Figure 8H). HCHF feeding significantly increased the mean CERT1 score to 7.5, which rose further to 8.1 in HCHF_DR mice, although the difference between the 2 HCHF groups was not statistically significant. Thus, mild dietary restriction failed to improve the ceramide-based cardiovascular risk profile. Instead, the persistently elevated CERT1 score is paralleled by the marked increase in atherosclerotic plaque burden observed in HCHF_DR mice (Figures 1 and 2).

We next examined sphingolipid composition in gallbladder bile (Supplemental Figure 5). In contrast to the liver, total biliary SM content increased significantly in response to dietary restriction (Supplemental Figure 5A). SFA-containing SM species were significantly enriched by HCHF feeding, whereas dietary restriction further increased MUFA-containing SM species by 150% in Chow_DR mice and 66% in HCHF_DR mice (Supplemental Figure 5B). PUFA-containing SM species were selectively increased only in Chow_DR animals. At the molecular level, dietary restriction significantly increased the proatherogenic SM species SM(16:0) and SM(24:1) in HCHF-fed mice (Supplemental Figure 5C).

Total biliary ceramide content was likewise significantly increased following HCHF feeding (Supplemental Figure 5A), with dietary restriction further enriching MUFA-containing ceramides (Supplemental Figure 5D). The proatherogenic Cer(24:1) remained elevated in HCHF-fed mice, whereas the cardioprotective Cer(23:0) increased and Cer(24:0) decreased in both Chow_DR and HCHF groups. Dietary restriction partially restored Cer(24:0) toward Chow control levels (P = 0.0303; Supplemental Figure 5F). Consistent with these molecular changes, the biliary CERT1 score was significantly elevated in HCHF-fed mice, reaching mean values of 5.2 and 6.9 in the HCHF and HCHF_DR groups, respectively.

Collectively, these findings demonstrate that HCHF feeding induces profound remodeling of hepatic and biliary sphingolipids, characterized by persistent enrichment of proatherogenic ceramide species and elevated CERT1 risk scores. Although time restricted feeding normalized total hepatic SM abundance, it failed to reverse the ceramide-associated cardiovascular risk signature and, in some cases, further increased proatherogenic sphingolipid species.

Discussion

Weight loss is generally recommended for patients with CVD, particularly those who are overweight, as it can improve multiple metabolic risk factors (1). However, the impact of mild food restriction on lipid remodeling — especially with respect to proatherogenic lipid species — remains poorly understood. To address this, we employed ApoE-deficient mice, a well-established model for atherosclerosis that develops plaques resembling human lesions even on a Chow diet and shows accelerated plaque progression on a high-fat/Western diet. Using deep lipidomics, we identified clinically relevant atherogenic lipid species previously detected in nearly 500 CVD and 775 T2DM patients. By integrating these datasets through a consensus-driven approach, we provide evidence that our findings in ApoE-deficient mice have direct clinical relevance.

Here we show that modest energy restriction achieved by time-restricted feeding accelerates atherosclerosis in ApoE-deficient mice, with the strongest effect observed in animals consuming a cholesterol-rich high-fat diet. Across multiple vascular regions and independent analytical approaches, including en face morphometry, histopathology, and machine learning–based lesion segmentation, we obtained evidence that dietary restriction increased plaque burden, resulting in larger and more numerous lesions compared with ad libitum–fed HCHF mice. Importantly, this effect was not limited to lesion expansion but was accompanied by features of advanced plaque remodeling, including increased necrotic core formation, reduced fibrous cap thickness, increased intima/media ratios, and enhanced inflammatory cell infiltration. Thus, in the setting of dietary cholesterol excess, modest reductions in energy intake promoted both quantitative and qualitative changes associated with accelerated and more vulnerable atherosclerotic lesions. Strikingly, time restricted feeding of Chow fed mice also caused hypercholesteremia and significant increase in plaque burden in the aortic arch, an increased intima to media ratio and a reduced cap size of the brachiocephalic branch. Thus, the vascular consequences of reduced energy intake are not universally protective but are strongly influenced by the underlying metabolic environment, dietary lipid composition, and adaptive responses in cholesterol homeostasis. This concept is particularly relevant given the widespread clinical use of pharmacological weight-loss therapies, including GLP-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonists.

Although both caloric restriction and GLP-1R agonism reduce body weight, they represent fundamentally distinct biological interventions. Beyond promoting weight loss, GLP-1R activation exerts pleiotropic effects on inflammation, immune cell function, endothelial biology, and lipid metabolism that are not reproduced by dietary energy restriction alone. Consistent with these differences, GLP-1R agonists have demonstrated antiatherogenic effects in experimental models, although clinical imaging studies have also reported complex changes in plaque composition, including an increase in fibrous plaque volume during liraglutide treatment (17). Accordingly, our findings should not be interpreted as challenging the established cardiovascular benefits of GLP-1–based therapies. Rather, they highlight that weight loss achieved through dietary energy restriction alone can elicit distinct, context-dependent metabolic adaptations, including proatherogenic lipid remodeling, that may accelerate atherosclerosis under conditions of impaired cholesterol clearance.

Mechanistically, our data suggest that dietary restriction under conditions of impaired cholesterol clearance promotes maladaptive cholesterol redistribution. The liver represents a central hub for cholesterol esterification, lipoprotein secretion, and BA synthesis, and clinical studies demonstrate coordinated lipid remodeling between liver, adipose tissue, and plasma compartments (12). In ApoE-deficient mice consuming an HCHF diet, mild dietary restriction increased hepatic free cholesterol and promoted accumulation of multiple clinically relevant proatherogenic lipid species, including cholesterol esters, PC, PE, LPC, SM, and ceramides. In contrast, Chow-fed mice subjected to the same intervention exhibited less lipidomic changes, indicating that the adverse response was strongly dependent on dietary cholesterol exposure.

Our findings suggest that mild caloric restriction induces a redistribution of endogenous lipid stores and alters cholesterol trafficking rather than simply increasing circulating TG availability. Although circulating TG concentrations were reduced across all intervention groups, hepatic cholesterol accumulation and enrichment of proatherogenic lipid species indicate enhanced flux of cholesterol and complex lipid metabolites toward the liver. Unlike fatty acids, which can be oxidized to meet energy demands, cholesterol cannot be utilized as an energy substrate and must therefore be stored, converted into BA, or redistributed through lipoprotein pathways. In ApoE-deficient mice, impaired remnant lipoprotein clearance limits efficient cholesterol disposal, resulting in hepatic cholesterol retention despite activation of compensatory pathways involved in cholesterol elimination. Excess hepatic cholesterol is subsequently redistributed into apoB-containing lipoproteins, contributing to marked hypercholesterolemia and accelerated atherosclerotic plaque progression.

The transcriptional response of hepatic cholesterol metabolism further supports this interpretation. HCHF feeding induced coordinated activation of pathways involved in cholesterol sequestration, mobilization, and disposal. Increased expression of Acat1 and Acat2 suggests enhanced cholesterol esterification capacity as an adaptive response to intracellular cholesterol excess. In contrast, dietary restriction preferentially increased Acat1 without further augmenting Acat2, suggesting a shift toward intracellular cholesterol buffering rather than enhanced esterification for lipoprotein secretion. Despite these compensatory responses, hepatic free cholesterol accumulated, indicating that cholesterol influx exceeded the capacity for storage and elimination.

Similarly, HCHF feeding caused a marked induction of Ces1g, consistent with enhanced hydrolysis of stored CE and mobilization of cholesterol pools. Dietary restriction attenuated this response while further increasing hepatic cholesterol accumulation, suggesting impaired cholesterol ester turnover and altered intracellular trafficking. Although Cyp7a1 and Cyp8b1 were strongly induced (i.e., 50 and 11-fold, respectively, indicating activation of BA synthesis), this response was insufficient to restore cholesterol balance (Figure 3F). Together, these findings suggest that mild dietary restriction does not enhance hepatic cholesterol disposal but instead alters cholesterol partitioning toward a state characterized by free cholesterol accumulation and proatherogenic lipid remodeling.

The lipidomic consequences of this altered cholesterol homeostasis were particularly striking. Under HCHF conditions, dietary restriction increased multiple lipid species previously associated with cardiovascular risk. Eight cholesterol ester species with established proatherogenic properties increased by approximately 1.5- to 9-fold, while 18 proatherogenic phospholipid species and 3 ceramide species increased by 1.5- to 5-fold. These findings are consistent with clinical lipidomic studies demonstrating associations between specific cholesterol ester, phospholipid, and ceramide species and cardiovascular risk (10, 11). For example, CE(16:1), identified in our study, has been associated with CVD risk in the Bruneck population study and independently validated in patients with T2DM and subclinical atherosclerosis (13, 15). By integrating these human lipid signatures through a consensus-based approach, our study provides evidence that the lipid remodeling observed in ApoE-deficient mice reflects clinically relevant pathways linked to human cardiovascular risk.

The accumulation of ceramides provides an additional mechanistic link between dietary restriction, lipid remodeling, and plaque progression. Plasma ceramide signatures predict cardiovascular mortality in patients with stable coronary artery disease and acute coronary syndromes (18). Accordingly, we calculated the CERT1 risk score and observed markedly elevated values following HCHF feeding, with mean scores of 7.5 and 8.1 in HCHF and HCHF_DR mice, respectively. Although dietary restriction did not significantly increase the CERT1 score beyond HCHF feeding alone, the directionality of change was consistent with the increased plaque burden observed in HCHF_DR animals.

Our findings align with emerging evidence that caloric restriction is not uniformly atheroprotective. Recent studies showed that caloric restriction accelerated atherosclerosis in ApoE/LDLr double-KO mice (19). Similarly, intermittent fasting improved dyslipidemia and reduced atherogenesis in Chow-fed mice but failed to protect ApoE-deficient mice fed cholesterol-rich diets (20, 21). Time-restricted feeding reduced lesion development in LDLr-deficient but not ApoE-deficient mice under HCHF conditions (22), whereas alternate-day fasting aggravated atherosclerosis in ApoE-deficient mice (23). Collectively, these observations indicate that the effects of energy restriction are strongly influenced by genetic determinants of lipoprotein metabolism and dietary lipid composition.

Importantly, the relevance of these findings extends beyond experimental models. Clinical studies have reported increased circulating total cholesterol and LDL-C during fasting in healthy individuals, patients with anorexia nervosa, and individuals undergoing prolonged fasting interventions (24–26). A recent systematic review further highlighted emerging concerns regarding intermittent fasting and hypercholesterolemia (27). Together with our lipidomic findings, these observations suggest that reductions in energy intake may require careful consideration of baseline lipid metabolism and cardiovascular risk status.

Specifically, our data identify a mechanistic link between weight loss and accelerated atherosclerosis through extensive proatherogenic lipid remodeling. Rather than simply elevating circulating cholesterol, mild caloric restriction mobilized energy stores, resulting in the release and redistribution of cholesterol together with multiple bioactive lipid species into the circulation. The coordinated increase in cholesterol-rich apoB-containing lipoproteins, phospholipids, SM, ceramides, and other proatherogenic lipids provides a plausible explanation for the paradoxical association between weight loss and adverse cardiovascular outcomes observed in some longitudinal human studies. This suggests that the quality of lipid remodeling accompanying weight loss, rather than weight reduction itself, is a critical determinant of cardiovascular risk. Although our findings do not argue against weight loss as a therapeutic goal, we suggest that the metabolic response to weight loss may differ among individuals, particularly those with impaired lipoprotein clearance or preexisting dyslipidemia. In these patients, weight reduction should be accompanied by careful assessment of the circulating lipidome and apoB-containing lipoproteins to ensure that beneficial reductions in adiposity are not offset by adverse remodeling of atherogenic lipids.

Several limitations should be considered when interpreting these findings. First, lipid metabolism differs between mice and humans. ApoE-deficient mice exhibit a lipoprotein profile enriched in VLDL and remnant particles rather than the LDL-dominant profile characteristic of human atherosclerosis. Second, ApoE deficiency accelerates atherosclerotic lesion development, which may enhance the sensitivity of the model to detect dietary effects on plaque progression. Third, the HCHF diet represents a metabolically challenging nutritional intervention that may not fully reflect typical human dietary exposure. Finally, although ApoE-deficient mice recapitulate many key features of atherosclerosis, they do not encompass the full spectrum of human cardiometabolic disease. Mild hypertension and endothelial dysfunction arise primarily as secondary consequences of advanced atherosclerosis, whereas hyperglycemia and insulin resistance are relatively modest and generally require prolonged exposure to a Western-style high-fat diet.

In conclusion, our study reveals that mild dietary restriction can paradoxically accelerate atherosclerosis despite reducing body weight by driving coordinated remodeling of the hepatic and circulating lipidome toward a proatherogenic state. By integrating quantitative lipidomics with analyses of cholesterol homeostasis and plaque pathology, we identify a mechanistic link between energy restriction, lipid mobilization, and the accumulation of multiple proatherogenic lipid species that promote disease progression. These findings challenge the prevailing assumption that modest weight loss is inherently cardioprotective and suggest that the metabolic quality of weight loss — not simply its magnitude — may determine cardiovascular benefit. This work provides a conceptual framework for reassessing dietary weight-loss interventions in individuals with dyslipidemia and supports prospective clinical studies to determine whether distinct nutritional strategies differentially influence atherogenic lipid remodeling and cardiovascular outcomes.

Methods

Sex as a biological variable. In this study, only male mice were used to minimize biological variability arising from fluctuations in oestrogen and progesterone, which are known to influence lipid metabolism, inflammatory responses, and plaque development. Additionally, male mice typically develop larger and more advanced atherosclerotic plaques under high-fat feeding, thereby increasing the sensitivity for detecting experimental effects (28).

Animals. Male apolipoprotein E-deficient (ApoE–/–) mice (C57BL/6-apo Etm1Unc) were purchased from Charles River Laboratories (France). Animals were housed in polycarbonate cages with sterilized softwood bedding (Lignocel BK8/15, Altromin, Lage, Germany) under controlled environmental conditions — i.e., temperature (22 ± 2°C), relative humidity (55 ± 10%), and a 12-hour light/dark cycle. Throughout the study, animals were monitored for general health, appearance, and behavior. As part of a satellite study that focused on histopathology, clinical chemistry, and gene expression analyses, ApoE-deficient mice were purchased from the Shanghai Model Organisms Center.

Dietary intervention. To investigate the effects of long-term dietary modulation on hepatic lipid composition and BA remodeling (Supplemental Figure 1), ApoE-deficient mice were fed either a standard soybean-based diet containing 4.5% fat and 0.003% cholesterol, or an atherogenic HCHF diet consisting of 18.7% milk fat and 0.17% cholesterol (Supplemental Table 1 and 2), over a 6-month period.

Additionally, to assess the effect of dietary restriction on the production of atherogenic phospholipids, a subset of ApoE-deficient mice underwent a mild food reduction. To induce small changes in body weight, mice in the Chow_DR and HCHF_DR groups underwent daily 15-hour time-restricted feeding (5:00 p.m.–8:00 a.m.) while maintaining ad libitum access to water resulting in an approximate 5% reduction in body weight gain.

Male ApoE-deficient mice aged 8–12 weeks were randomly assigned to the dietary groups. All diets were obtained from Sniff Spezialitäten GmbH. Unless otherwise specified, food and tap water were provided ad libitum.

Each experimental group included 10 animals. At the conclusion of the 6-month intervention, liver tissues and bile samples were collected for comprehensive lipidomic and BA profiling.

Tissue and bile samples were provided by R. Schleef, Research Laboratories GmbH, and are derived from sham animals from the original study by Holt et al. (29).

Hematological, biochemical, and corticosterone analyses. At study termination, blood samples were collected by cardiac puncture under isoflurane anesthesia. Whole blood was analyzed for complete blood counts using an XN-1000V-1-A automated hematology analyser (Sysmex). Plasma was obtained by centrifugation and analyzed using a BX-3010 fully automated clinical chemistry analyser (Sysmex) for measurement of glucose, HDL-C, LDL-C, total cholesterol, and TG concentrations. Plasma corticosterone levels were quantified using a Mouse Corticosterone ELISA kit (LDN, AR E-8100R) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Analysis and quantification of atherosclerotic plaques. The aorta, including the aortic root, aortic arch, and its 3 major branches (brachiocephalic artery, left common carotid artery, and left subclavian artery), was collected, fixed in 4% neutral-buffered formalin, and processed into formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) blocks according to standard laboratory protocols. For en face analysis, longitudinally opened aortas were stained with Oil Red O to visualize and quantify lipid-rich atherosclerotic lesions. Serial transverse sections of the aortic root and longitudinal sections of the aortic arch were stained with H&E, EvG, and Oil Red O for histological assessment of plaque burden, composition, and stability.

Lesion area, necrotic core size, and fibrous cap thickness were quantified using ImageJ with the Trainable Weka Segmentation plugin (30), enabling machine-learning–assisted segmentation and standardized analysis of plaque morphology. Plaque stability was assessed based on necrotic core formation and fibrous cap thickness. Inflammatory cell infiltration was evaluated on H&E-stained sections by an experienced pathologist using established morphological criteria and quantified using QuPath software (version 0.7.0). Inflammatory cell density was expressed as the number of inflammatory cells per plaque area (cells/1,000 μm2).

Identification of BA and their conjugates. BA profiling was performed using LC–ESI–MS/MS as previously described (31–33). Standards (>95% purity) were obtained from several suppliers. We analyzed various BA and their conjugates, including tauro- and glycoconjugates of cholic, chenodeoxycholic, deoxycholic, lithocholic, and ursodeoxycholic acids. Deuterated forms of selected BA served as internal standards (IS).

Quantification was based on the ratio of BA peak areas to their respective IS. For BA without identical deuterated IS, the closest IS by retention time and MRM transition was used.

Lipid extraction of liver tissue and gall bladder bile. Liver samples were homogenized in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) using an Ultra-Turrax homogenizer, with 300 μL PBS added per 500 mg of tissue. In total, 5 μL of the resulting homogenate were used for lipid extraction according to the method of Bligh and Dyer (34), in the presence of nonnaturally occurring lipid species serving as internal standards.

The following internal standards were included in the extraction: CE 17:0, CE 22:0, Cer 18:1;O2/14:0, Cer 18:1;O2/17:0, Cer 18:1;O2[D7]/18:0, Free cholesterol [D7] (FC[D7]), GlcCer 18:1;O2/12:0, GlcCer 18:1;O2[D5]/18:0, LPC 13:0, LPC 19:0. PC: PC 14:0/14:0, PC 22:0/22:0. PE: PE 14:0/14:0, PE 20:0/20:0 (di-phytanoyl), PS 14:0/14:0, and PS 20:0/20:0 (di-phytanoyl).

Quantitative lipidomics. We quantified lipids by direct flow injection electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (ESI-MS/MS) in positive ion mode, using an established analytical setup (35). We employed specific precursor and neutral loss scans for lipid class identification and quantification: PC, SM, and LPC were detected using a precursor ion of m/z 184 (35, 36). PE and PS were analyzed via neutral losses of 141 and 185 Da, respectively (37). PE(P) were analyzed following the methodology described by Zemski-Berry (38). Ceramides (Cer) and hexosylceramides (HexCer) were detected via a fragment ion of m/z 264 (39). FC and CE were quantified using a fragment ion of m/z 369, following selective derivatization of FC (40).

Quantification of cholesterol in liver tissue and gallbladder bile. Cholesterol and cholesterol esters were quantified using ESI-MS/MS in positive ion mode by comparison to analytical standards. Lipids were extracted from liver tissue and gallbladder bile and analyzed by direct flow injection using a validated bioanalytical assay (40). FC and CE were quantified by monitoring the fragment ion at m/z 369 Da following selective derivatization of FC, as described previously (40). Total cholesterol was calculated as the sum of FC and CE.

Lipidomics data processing. Quantitative lipidomics data were analyzed in R (version 4.6.0). Global lipidomic variation was first assessed by PLS-DA. Pairwise OPLS-DA was subsequently performed using the ropls package (version 1.44.0) to identify lipid species driving group separation. Model robustness was evaluated by 200-permutation testing, and predictive performance was assessed using cumulative R2Y and Q2 values. VIP scores were calculated for each pairwise OPLS-DA model, and lipid species with a VIP score > 1.0 and P < 0.05 were considered discriminatory. Differentially abundant lipids were visualized by heatmaps generated from row-wise Z-score–normalized data followed by hierarchical clustering, while OPLS-DA S-plots were used to identify the lipid species contributing most strongly to class discrimination.

Ceramide risk score (CERT1) calculation. We adapted the scoring method from Laaksonen et al. (18) and calculated the CERT1 at baseline using tissue concentrations of 4 ceramide species: Cer(16:0), Cer(18:0), Cer(24:1), and Cer(24:0). For each animal, the absolute concentrations of Cer(16:0), Cer(18:0), and Cer(24:1), as well as their ratios to Cer(24:0), were evaluated against the distribution of all animals.

Scoring was assigned based on quartile distribution: Values in the third quartile received 1 point, and those in the fourth quartile received 2 points. Cer(24:0) itself was not scored. The total CERT1 score, thus, ranged from 0 to 12. The following scale was used to assign cardiovascular risk categories based on the total score as follows: Low risk: 0–2; moderate risk: 3–6, increased risk: 7–9 and high risk: 10–12.

RNA isolation and qPCR. Liver tissue was snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and homogenized in RLT buffer (Qiagen). Total RNA was extracted using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen), and RNA concentration and purity were determined with a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized from total RNA using the All-in-One RT SuperMix for qPCR with dsDNase (Azaood) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. qPCR was performed using Taq SYBR Green qPCR Premix (Universal) (Azaood) on a QuantStudio 5 Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Each sample was analyzed in technical triplicate. Relative gene expression was calculated using the comparative 2–ΔΔCt method with Gapdh as the reference gene. Primer sequences are provided in Supplemental Table 4.

Statistics. We performed power analysis in R using the pwr package to estimate the required group size for detecting statistically significant differences between the 2 dietary intervention groups, assuming a significance level (α) of 0.05 and a power (1−β) of 0.8. Based on total cholesterol, the estimated sample size was 9 animals. Therefore, a group size of 10 animals deemed sufficient for all planned comparisons.

Data distribution was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test for normality. For datasets not meeting normality assumptions, nonparametric tests including the Kruskal–Wallis test and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test (Mann-Whitney U test) were applied. For normally distributed data, we considered 1-way ANOVA and unpaired 2-tailed t tests as appropriate.

Study approval. Ethical approval was obtained from the local authority (Aktenzeichen: 50.203.2-INBIFO 11/02, Bezirksregierung Köln). As detailed in the original publication (29), all experimental procedures were conducted in accordance with institutional and international guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals. Furthermore, the study adhered to the policies outlined by the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science (AALAS) for the humane care and use of laboratory animals.

Data availability. All data generated during this study are included in this article and the accompanying Supporting Data Values file. Additional information are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Manuscript information

Author contributions. YZ contributed data acquisition, image analysis of atherosclerotic plaques, data interpretation, bioinformatics, R-computing, and preparation of artworks. YX contributed data acquisition, interpretation, statistical analysis, bioinformatics, and R-computing. GL contributed quantitative lipidomic analysis and data collection. JB contributed conception and design of the study; histopathology of atherosclerotic plaques, data analysis, and interpretation; and writing of the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

AI disclosure. No artificial intelligence (AI) tools were used in the design or conduct of the research, data collection or extraction, data analysis, interpretation of results, preparation of the first draft of the manuscript, or creation of figures and other scientific content. ChatGPT (GPT-5.6) was used solely for language editing and refinement of the manuscript from July 15 to July 28, 2026. The authors reviewed and approved all edited text and remain fully responsible for the content and accuracy of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest. The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Funding support. Funding for this work was provided by the following:

  • European Union LipidomicNet, “Lipid droplets as dynamic organelles of fat deposition and release: translational research toward human disease,” the Seventh Framework Programme
  • Virtual Liver Network (VLN), German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), Grant number 031 6154, to JB
Supplemental material

View Supplemental data

View Supporting data values

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the EU and the German Ministry of Science and Education (BMBF) for financial support and R Schleef for donating tissue samples. We thank Christian Hartmann and Elisabeth Rathke for support in the histopathology work and Yuhao Sun work support in the qPCR studies.

Address for correspondence. Jürgen Borlak, Centre for Pharmacology and Toxicology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany. Phone: 49.511.532.7250; Email: Borlak.Juergen@mh-hannover.de.

Footnotes

Copyright: © 2026, Zhu et al. This is an open access article published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Reference information: JCI Insight. 2026;11(21):e202798.https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.202798.

References
  1. Arnett DK, et al. 2019 ACC/AHA guideline on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2019;140(11):e596–e646.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  2. Lee AK, et al. The risks of cardiovascular disease and mortality following weight change in adults with diabetes: results from ADVANCE. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;105(1):152–162.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  3. Doehner W, et al. Obesity and weight loss are inversely related to mortality and cardiovascular outcome in prediabetes and type 2 diabetes: data from the ORIGIN trial. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(28):2668–2677.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  4. Rubino D, et al. Effect of continued weekly subcutaneous semaglutide versus placebo on weight loss maintenance in adults with overweight or obesity: the STEP 4 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2021;325(14):1414–1425.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  5. Piccini S, et al. Time-dependent effect of GLP-1 receptor agonists on cardiovascular benefits: a real-world study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2023;22(1):69.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  6. Bangalore S, et al. Body-weight fluctuations and outcomes in coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(14):1332–1340.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  7. Liu J, et al. Weight change and risk of atherosclerosis measured by carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) from a prospective cohort-analysis of the first-wave follow-up data of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA). J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023;10(10):435.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  8. Lee DH, et al. Differential associations of weight dynamics with coronary artery calcium versus common carotid artery intima-media thickness: The CARDIA Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2010;172(2):180–189.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  9. Puri P, et al. A lipidomic analysis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2007;46(4):1081–1090.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  10. Eichelmann F, et al. Lipidome changes due to improved dietary fat quality inform cardiometabolic risk reduction and precision nutrition. Nat Med. 2024;30(10):2867–2877.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  11. Eichelmann F, et al. Deep lipidomics in human plasma: cardiometabolic disease risk and effect of dietary fat modulation. Circulation. 2022;146(1):21–35.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  12. Ooi GJ, et al. Hepatic lipidomic remodeling in severe obesity manifests with steatosis and does not evolve with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. J Hepatol. 2021;75(3):524–535.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  13. Barranco-Altirriba M, et al. Lipidomic analysis reveals metabolism alteration associated with subclinical carotid atherosclerosis in type 2 diabetes. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2025;24(1):152.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  14. Sojo L, et al. Plasma lipidomics profiles highlight the associations of the dual antioxidant/pro-oxidant molecules sphingomyelin and phosphatidylcholine with subclinical atherosclerosis in patients with type 1 diabetes. Antioxidants (Basel). 2023;12(5):1132.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  15. Stegemann C, et al. Lipidomics profiling and risk of cardiovascular disease in the prospective population-based Bruneck study. Circulation. 2014;129(18):1821–1831.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  16. Morita SY. Phospholipid biomarkers of coronary heart disease. J Pharm Health Care Sci. 2024;10(1):23.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  17. Heinsen LJ, et al. Liraglutide treatment is associated with progression of coronary artery fibrous plaque: a prospective 1-year follow-up study in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023;23(1):214.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  18. Laaksonen R, et al. Plasma ceramides predict cardiovascular death in patients with stable coronary artery disease and acute coronary syndromes beyond LDL-cholesterol. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(25):1967–1976.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  19. Kostogrys RB, et al. Negative impact of caloric restriction on atherosclerosis in young ApoE/LDLr –/– mice. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2025;59(3):297–312.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  20. Mérian J, et al. Intermittent fasting resolves dyslipidemia and atherogenesis in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice in a diet-dependent manner, irrespective of sex. Cells. 2023;12(4):533.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  21. Inoue KI, et al. Time-restricted feeding prevents high-fat and high-cholesterol diet-induced obesity but fails to ameliorate atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-knockout mice. Exp Anim. 2021;70(2):194–202.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  22. Chaix A, et al. Time-restricted feeding reduces atherosclerosis in LDLR KO mice but not in ApoE knockout mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2024;44(9):2069–2087.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  23. Deng Y, et al. Alternate day fasting aggravates atherosclerosis through the suppression of hepatic ATF3 in Apoe–/– mice. Life Metab. 2024;3(3):loae009.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  24. Sävendahl L, Underwood LE. Fasting increases serum total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein B in healthy, nonobese humans. J Nutr. 1999;129(11):2005–2008.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  25. Rigaud D, et al. Hypercholesterolaemia in anorexia nervosa: frequency and changes during refeeding. Diabetes Metab. 2009;35(1):57–63.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  26. Dai Z, et al. Effects of 10-day complete fasting on physiological homeostasis, nutrition and health markers in male adults. Nutrients. 2022;14(18):3860.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  27. Semnani-Azad Z, et al. Intermittent fasting strategies and their effects on body weight and other cardiometabolic risk factors: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials. BMJ. 2025;389:e082007.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  28. Pereira TMC, et al. Cardiac and vascular changes in elderly atherosclerotic mice: the influence of gender. Lipids Health Dis. 2010;9:87.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  29. von Holt K, et al. Progression of atherosclerosis in the Apo E–/– model: 12-month exposure to cigarette mainstream smoke combined with high-cholesterol/fat diet. Atherosclerosis. 2009;205(1):135–143.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  30. Arganda-Carreras I, et al. Trainable Weka segmentation: a machine learning tool for microscopy pixel classification. Bioinformatics. 2017;33(15):2424–2426.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  31. Gnewuch C, et al. Serum bile acid profiling reflects enterohepatic detoxification state and intestinal barrier function in inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15(25):3134–3141.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  32. von Hardenberg S, et al. ApoE is a major determinant of hepatic bile acid homeostasis in mice. J Nutr Biochem. 2018;52:82–91.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  33. Hewitt PG, et al. A rat toxicogenomics study with the calcium sensitizer EMD82571 reveals a pleiotropic cause of teratogenicity. Reprod Toxicol. 2014;47:89–101.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  34. Bligh EG, Dyer WJ. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can J Biochem Physiol. 1959;37(8):911–917.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  35. Liebisch G, et al. High-throughput quantification of phosphatidylcholine and sphingomyelin by electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry coupled with isotope correction algorithm. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2004;1686(1-2):108–117.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  36. Liebisch G, et al. High-throughput quantification of lysophosphatidylcholine by electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. Clin Chem. 2002;48(12):2217–2224.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  37. Matyash V, et al. Lipid extraction by methyl-tert-butyl ether for high-throughput lipidomics. J Lipid Res. 2008;49(5):1137–1146.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  38. Zemski Berry KA, Murphy RC. Electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry of glycerophosphoethanolamine plasmalogen phospholipids. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2004;15(10):1499–1508.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  39. Liebisch G, et al. Quantitative measurement of different ceramide species from crude cellular extracts by electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (ESI-MS/MS). J Lipid Res. 1999;40(8):1539–1546.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  40. Liebisch G, et al. High throughput quantification of cholesterol and cholesteryl ester by electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (ESI-MS/MS). Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006;1761(1):121–128.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Version history
  • Version 1 (September 28, 2026): In-Press Preview
  • Version 2 (November 9, 2026): Electronic publication

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Metrics

  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Go to

  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Methods
  • Manuscript information
  • Supplemental material
  • Acknowledgments
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts