Usage Information
Abstract
The Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine (AAIM) first convened a workshop in 2015 that brought a small group of internal medicine program directors together who recognized the growing success of early-phase physician-scientist training programs but the unclear path afterward for these trainees. The meeting subsequently evolved into what is now the annual American Society for Clinical Investigation/AAIM/Burroughs Wellcome Fund (ASCI/AAIM/BWF) Physician-Scientist Pathways Workshop, which continues to bring stakeholders together to discuss the obstacles to success that physician-scientists face at all stages of their careers. This perspective presents the history and goals of the workshop, with an emphasis on the most recent meeting in 2024, and looks ahead to the work that still needs to be done to ensure a robust physician-scientist workforce.
Authors
Kyu Y. Rhee, Charles W. Emala, Emily Jane Gallagher, Don C. Rockey, Patrick J. Hu, Jatin M. Vyas, Daniel P. Cook, Tiffany C. Scharschmidt, Olujimi A. Ajijola, ASCI Research Pathways Working Group, Christopher S. Williams
Usage data is cumulative from May 2025 through May 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 2,556 | 270 |
| 603 | 33 | |
| Figure | 522 | 0 |
| Table | 385 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 162 | 4 |
| Citation downloads | 338 | 0 |
| Totals | 4,566 | 307 |
| Total Views | 4,873 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
