Usage Information
Abstract
BACKGROUND Thymic involution with age leads to reduced T cell output and impaired adaptive immunity. However, the extent to which thymic activity persists later in life and how this contributes to immunological aging remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the presence and function of thymic tissue in older adults and identify factors influencing residual thymopoiesis.METHODS Patients aged 50 or older undergoing cardiothoracic surgery were recruited. Thymic structures within mediastinal adipose tissue were evaluated using histology, immunofluorescence, flow cytometry, T cell receptor (TCR) sequencing, and RNA sequencing. Recent thymic emigrants (RTEs) were quantified in peripheral blood and correlated with transcriptomic, epigenetic, and TCR repertoire data. Primary outcomes included thymic tissue identification, RTE frequency, and immune correlates.RESULTS Functional thymic tissue was identified in mediastinal adipose tissue of older individuals. The frequency of CD31+CD4+ T cells (RTEs) positively correlated with the presence of thymic tissue. Thymic output showed substantial heterogeneity and was influenced by sex and smoking history. Thymic activity was associated with increased TCR repertoire diversity, improved immune protection against infections, and reduced epigenetic aging. Detailed profiling uncovered functional and phenotypic heterogeneity within naive CD4+ T cell subsets shaped by thymic activity.CONCLUSION This study demonstrates that thymic function can persist into later life and is modulated by factors such as sex and smoking. These findings suggest that thymic activity during aging is heterogeneous and influenced by more than chronological age alone, with potential implications for immune competence in older adults.
Authors
Balraj Sandhar, Vishal Vyas, Daniel Harding, Roberta Ragazzini, Paola Bonfanti, Federica M. Marelli-Berg, Christopher G. Bell, Benny M. Chain, M. Paula Longhi
Usage data is cumulative from July 2025 through June 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 3,462 | 219 |
| 564 | 54 | |
| Figure | 520 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 419 | 7 |
| Citation downloads | 258 | 0 |
| Totals | 5,223 | 280 |
| Total Views | 5,503 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
