Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact

Usage Information

Macrophage RAGE activation is proinflammatory in NASH
Gopanandan Parthasarathy, Amy S. Mauer, Naresh Golla, P. Vineeth Daniel, Lily H. Kim, Guneet S. Sidhu, George W. Marek III, Emilien Loeuillard, Anuradha Krishnan, Hyun Se Kim Lee, Kevin D. Pavelko, Michael Charlton, Petra Hirsova, Sumera I. Ilyas, Harmeet Malhi
Gopanandan Parthasarathy, Amy S. Mauer, Naresh Golla, P. Vineeth Daniel, Lily H. Kim, Guneet S. Sidhu, George W. Marek III, Emilien Loeuillard, Anuradha Krishnan, Hyun Se Kim Lee, Kevin D. Pavelko, Michael Charlton, Petra Hirsova, Sumera I. Ilyas, Harmeet Malhi
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Hepatology Inflammation

Macrophage RAGE activation is proinflammatory in NASH

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Intrahepatic macrophages in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) are heterogenous and include proinflammatory recruited monocyte-derived macrophages. The receptor for advanced glycation endproducts (RAGE) is expressed on macrophages and can be activated by damage associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) upregulated in NASH, yet the role of macrophage-specific RAGE signaling in NASH is unclear. Therefore, we hypothesized that RAGE-expressing macrophages are proinflammatory and mediate liver inflammation in NASH. Compared with healthy controls, RAGE expression was increased in liver biopsies from patients with NASH. In a high-fat, -fructose, and -cholesterol–induced (FFC)-induced murine model of NASH, RAGE expression was increased, specifically on recruited macrophages. FFC mice that received a pharmacological inhibitor of RAGE (TTP488), and myeloid-specific RAGE KO mice (RAGE-MKO) had attenuated liver injury associated with a reduced accumulation of RAGE+ recruited macrophages. Transcriptomics analysis suggested that pathways of macrophage and T cell activation were upregulated by FFC diet, inhibited by TTP488 treatment, and reduced in RAGE-MKO mice. Correspondingly, the secretome of ligand-stimulated BM-derived macrophages from RAGE-MKO mice had an attenuated capacity to activate CD8+ T cells. Our data implicate RAGE as what we propose to be a novel and potentially targetable mediator of the proinflammatory signaling of recruited macrophages in NASH.

Authors

Gopanandan Parthasarathy, Amy S. Mauer, Naresh Golla, P. Vineeth Daniel, Lily H. Kim, Guneet S. Sidhu, George W. Marek III, Emilien Loeuillard, Anuradha Krishnan, Hyun Se Kim Lee, Kevin D. Pavelko, Michael Charlton, Petra Hirsova, Sumera I. Ilyas, Harmeet Malhi

×

Usage data is cumulative from May 2025 through May 2026.

Usage JCI PMC
Text version 1,803 246
PDF 219 75
Figure 796 4
Supplemental data 160 20
Citation downloads 127 0
Totals 3,105 345
Total Views 3,450

Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.

Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.

Advertisement

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts