Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Potentiating the radiation-induced type I interferon antitumoral immune response by ATM inhibition in pancreatic cancer
Qiang Zhang, Long Jiang, Weiwei Wang, Amanda K. Huber, Victoria M. Valvo, Kassidy M. Jungles, Erin A. Holcomb, Ashley N. Pearson, Stephanie The, Zhuwen Wang, Leslie A. Parsels, Joshua D. Parsels, Daniel R. Wahl, Arvind Rao, Vaibhav Sahai, Theodore S. Lawrence, Michael D. Green, Meredith A. Morgan
Qiang Zhang, Long Jiang, Weiwei Wang, Amanda K. Huber, Victoria M. Valvo, Kassidy M. Jungles, Erin A. Holcomb, Ashley N. Pearson, Stephanie The, Zhuwen Wang, Leslie A. Parsels, Joshua D. Parsels, Daniel R. Wahl, Arvind Rao, Vaibhav Sahai, Theodore S. Lawrence, Michael D. Green, Meredith A. Morgan
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Oncology

Potentiating the radiation-induced type I interferon antitumoral immune response by ATM inhibition in pancreatic cancer

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Radiotherapy induces a type I interferon–mediated (T1IFN-mediated) antitumoral immune response that we hypothesized could be potentiated by a first-in-class ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) inhibitor, leading to enhanced innate immune signaling, T1IFN expression, and sensitization to immunotherapy in pancreatic cancer. We evaluated the effects of AZD1390 or a structurally related compound, AZD0156, on innate immune signaling and found that both inhibitors enhanced radiation-induced T1IFN expression via the POLIII/RIG-I/MAVS pathway. In immunocompetent syngeneic mouse models of pancreatic cancer, ATM inhibitor enhanced radiation-induced antitumoral immune responses and sensitized tumors to anti–PD-L1, producing immunogenic memory and durable tumor control. Therapeutic responses were associated with increased intratumoral CD8+ T cell frequency and effector function. Tumor control was dependent on CD8+ T cells, as therapeutic efficacy was blunted in CD8+ T cell–depleted mice. Adaptive immune responses to combination therapy provided systemic control of contralateral tumors outside of the radiation field. Taken together, we show that a clinical candidate ATM inhibitor enhances radiation-induced T1IFN, leading to both innate and subsequent adaptive antitumoral immune responses and sensitization of otherwise resistant pancreatic cancer to immunotherapy.

Authors

Qiang Zhang, Long Jiang, Weiwei Wang, Amanda K. Huber, Victoria M. Valvo, Kassidy M. Jungles, Erin A. Holcomb, Ashley N. Pearson, Stephanie The, Zhuwen Wang, Leslie A. Parsels, Joshua D. Parsels, Daniel R. Wahl, Arvind Rao, Vaibhav Sahai, Theodore S. Lawrence, Michael D. Green, Meredith A. Morgan

×

Figure 6

AZD1390, radiotherapy, and anti–PD-L1 generate CD8+ T cell–dependent, systemic tumor control.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
AZD1390, radiotherapy, and anti–PD-L1 generate CD8+ T cell–dependent, sy...
(A) mT4 tumor volumes in implanted C57BL/6 mice with or without triple combinational treatment of AZD1390, radiation (RT), and anti–PD-L1 (as illustrated in Figure 3A) in the absence or presence of anti-CD8 antibody (250 μg, administered day –1, 2, 5, and 8). Number of mice per treatment arm = 10 (ctrl), 10 (αCD8), 20 (αPD-L1+AZD1390+RT), and 20 (αCD8+αPD-L1+AZD1390+RT). (B) KPC2 and mT4 tumor inoculation and treatment schema showing primary and contralateral tumor implantation at day –12 and –8, respectively. Primary tumors were treated with the same schedule as Figure 3A with the exception of with 3 doses of anti–PD-L1. (C and D) Tumor growth curves of irradiated tumors (primary, C) and unirradiated contralateral tumors (D) in KPC2 tumor-bearing mice after the indicated treatments. N mice per treatment arm = 6 (ctrl), 6 (AZD1390), 8 (RT), 8 (AZD1390+RT), 8 (αPD-L1), 8 (αPD-L1+AZD1390), 8 (αPD-L1+RT), and 10 (αPD-L1+AZD1390+RT). Data represent the mean ± SEM. Statistical analyses were carried out by 1-way ANOVA with a multiple comparison post test. **P < 0.01, ****P < 0.0001.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts