Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Potentiating the radiation-induced type I interferon antitumoral immune response by ATM inhibition in pancreatic cancer
Qiang Zhang, Long Jiang, Weiwei Wang, Amanda K. Huber, Victoria M. Valvo, Kassidy M. Jungles, Erin A. Holcomb, Ashley N. Pearson, Stephanie The, Zhuwen Wang, Leslie A. Parsels, Joshua D. Parsels, Daniel R. Wahl, Arvind Rao, Vaibhav Sahai, Theodore S. Lawrence, Michael D. Green, Meredith A. Morgan
Qiang Zhang, Long Jiang, Weiwei Wang, Amanda K. Huber, Victoria M. Valvo, Kassidy M. Jungles, Erin A. Holcomb, Ashley N. Pearson, Stephanie The, Zhuwen Wang, Leslie A. Parsels, Joshua D. Parsels, Daniel R. Wahl, Arvind Rao, Vaibhav Sahai, Theodore S. Lawrence, Michael D. Green, Meredith A. Morgan
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Oncology

Potentiating the radiation-induced type I interferon antitumoral immune response by ATM inhibition in pancreatic cancer

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Radiotherapy induces a type I interferon–mediated (T1IFN-mediated) antitumoral immune response that we hypothesized could be potentiated by a first-in-class ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) inhibitor, leading to enhanced innate immune signaling, T1IFN expression, and sensitization to immunotherapy in pancreatic cancer. We evaluated the effects of AZD1390 or a structurally related compound, AZD0156, on innate immune signaling and found that both inhibitors enhanced radiation-induced T1IFN expression via the POLIII/RIG-I/MAVS pathway. In immunocompetent syngeneic mouse models of pancreatic cancer, ATM inhibitor enhanced radiation-induced antitumoral immune responses and sensitized tumors to anti–PD-L1, producing immunogenic memory and durable tumor control. Therapeutic responses were associated with increased intratumoral CD8+ T cell frequency and effector function. Tumor control was dependent on CD8+ T cells, as therapeutic efficacy was blunted in CD8+ T cell–depleted mice. Adaptive immune responses to combination therapy provided systemic control of contralateral tumors outside of the radiation field. Taken together, we show that a clinical candidate ATM inhibitor enhances radiation-induced T1IFN, leading to both innate and subsequent adaptive antitumoral immune responses and sensitization of otherwise resistant pancreatic cancer to immunotherapy.

Authors

Qiang Zhang, Long Jiang, Weiwei Wang, Amanda K. Huber, Victoria M. Valvo, Kassidy M. Jungles, Erin A. Holcomb, Ashley N. Pearson, Stephanie The, Zhuwen Wang, Leslie A. Parsels, Joshua D. Parsels, Daniel R. Wahl, Arvind Rao, Vaibhav Sahai, Theodore S. Lawrence, Michael D. Green, Meredith A. Morgan

×

Figure 3

Combined therapy with ATM inhibitor, radiotherapy, and anti–PD-L1 inhibits pancreatic tumor growth and induces durable antitumor immune responses.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Combined therapy with ATM inhibitor, radiotherapy, and anti–PD-L1 inhibi...
(A) Schematic showing schedules of AZD1390 or AZD0156, radiation (RT), and anti–PD-L1 antibody treatment. AZD1390 or AZD0156 (20 mg/kg) was orally administered approximately 1 hour before radiation (8 Gy) on day 0 as well as on days 1–4 and 7–11. Mouse anti–PD-L1 antibody (100 μg/mL) was intraperitoneally injected every 3 days for a total of 4 doses. (B and C) C57BL/6 mice with mT4 tumors were treated as illustrated with AZD1390 in A. Data represent mean tumor volumes ± SEM (B) or tumor volume doubling time (C). Data are from n = 10 (ctrl), 10 (AZD1390), 12 (αPD-L1), 16 (AZD1390+αPD-L1), 14 (RT), 16 (AZD1390+RT), 16 (αPD-L1+RT), and 20 (AZD1390+RT+αPD-L1) tumors per treatment group. (D and E) C57BL/6 mice with mT4 tumors were treated with AZD0156 as illustrated in A. Data represent mean tumor volumes ± SEM (D) or the time for tumor volume doubling (E). Data are from n = 10–16 tumors per treatment group. (F and G) Mice with complete responses to AZD1390, RT, and anti–PD-L1 were rechallenged with mT4 (106) cells 7 days (F) and 90 days (G) after complete response. Naive C57BL/6 were similarly rechallenged. Data represent the mean tumor volume from naive (n = 10) or previously treated C57BL/6 (n = 8). Data represent mean tumor volumes ± SEM. Statistical analysis for B–E were carried out by 1-way ANOVA with a multiple comparison post test. Statistical significance in F and G was determined using 2-tailed, unpaired t tests. ****P < 0.0001.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts