Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
IRF4 expression by lung dendritic cells drives acute but not Trm cell–dependent memory Th2 responses
Daniel F. Camacho, Tania E. Velez, Maile K. Hollinger, Esther Wang, Chanie L. Howard, Eli P. Darnell, Domenick E. Kennedy, Paulette A. Krishack, Cara L. Hrusch, Marcus R. Clark, James J. Moon, Anne I. Sperling
Daniel F. Camacho, Tania E. Velez, Maile K. Hollinger, Esther Wang, Chanie L. Howard, Eli P. Darnell, Domenick E. Kennedy, Paulette A. Krishack, Cara L. Hrusch, Marcus R. Clark, James J. Moon, Anne I. Sperling
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Immunology

IRF4 expression by lung dendritic cells drives acute but not Trm cell–dependent memory Th2 responses

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Expression of the transcription factor interferon regulatory factor 4 (IRF4) is required for the development of lung conventional DCs type 2 (cDC2s) that elicit Th2 responses, yet how IRF4 functions in lung cDC2s throughout the acute and memory allergic response is not clear. Here, we used a mouse model that loses IRF4 expression after lung cDC2 development to demonstrate that mice with IRF4-deficient DCs display impaired memory responses to allergen. This defect in the memory response was a direct result of ineffective Th2 induction and impaired recruitment of activated effector T cells to the lung after sensitization. IRF4-deficient DCs demonstrated defects in their migration to the draining lymph node and in T cell priming. Finally, T cells primed by IRF4-competent DCs mediated potent memory responses independently of IRF4-expressing DCs, demonstrating that IRF4-expressing DCs are not necessary during the memory response. Thus, IRF4 controlled a program in mature DCs governing Th2 priming and effector responses, but IRF4-expressing DCs were dispensable during tissue-resident memory T cell–dependent memory responses.

Authors

Daniel F. Camacho, Tania E. Velez, Maile K. Hollinger, Esther Wang, Chanie L. Howard, Eli P. Darnell, Domenick E. Kennedy, Paulette A. Krishack, Cara L. Hrusch, Marcus R. Clark, James J. Moon, Anne I. Sperling

×

Figure 5

Ex vivo–sorted CD24+ cDC2s require IRF4 for robust T cell priming in vitro.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Ex vivo–sorted CD24+ cDC2s require IRF4 for robust T cell priming in vit...
(A) Schematic of experimental protocol for in vivo sensitization to HDM+ OVA, DC sorting, and in vitro coculture with CFSE-labeled T cells from naive OTII mice. (B and C) Number of OTII cells after culture, percentage undivided, division index, proliferation index, and CFSE dilution histograms for (B) in vivo HDM+OVA–sensitized CD24+ cDC2s (n = 20) or (C) those with OVA323–339 peptide added (n = 20). (B and C) Data are representative of 2 independent experiments with n ≥ 4 wells per group; statistics (unpaired t test with Welch’s correction) were performed in GraphPad Prism. (D) IL-33 and IL-10 expression by qPCR of sorted lung cDC2s after in vivo HDM sensitization; n = 6. Data represent 1 experiment with n = 3 mice per group; statistics (unpaired t test) were performed in GraphPad Prism. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ****P < 0.0001). Also see Supplemental Figure 6.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts