Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
miR-511-3p protects against cockroach allergen–induced lung inflammation by antagonizing CCL2
Danh C. Do, Jie Mu, Xia Ke, Karan Sachdeva, Zili Qin, Mei Wan, Faoud T. Ishmael, Peisong Gao
Danh C. Do, Jie Mu, Xia Ke, Karan Sachdeva, Zili Qin, Mei Wan, Faoud T. Ishmael, Peisong Gao
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Immunology Inflammation

miR-511-3p protects against cockroach allergen–induced lung inflammation by antagonizing CCL2

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

miR-511-3p, encoded by CD206/Mrc1, was demonstrated to reduce allergic inflammation and promote alternative (M2) macrophage polarization. Here, we sought to elucidate the fundamental mechanism by which miR-511-3p attenuates allergic inflammation and promotes macrophage polarization. Compared with WT mice, the allergen-challenged Mrc1–/– mice showed increased airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and inflammation. However, this increased AHR and inflammation were significantly attenuated when these mice were pretransduced with adeno-associated virus–miR-511-3p (AAV–miR-511-3p). Gene expression profiling of macrophages identified Ccl2 as one of the major genes that was highly expressed in M2 macrophages but antagonized by miR-511-3p. The interaction between miR-511-3p and Ccl2 was confirmed by in silico analysis and mRNA-miR pulldown assay. Further evidence for the inhibition of Ccl2 by miR-511-3p was given by reduced levels of Ccl2 in supernatants of miR-511-3p–transduced macrophages and in bronchoalveolar lavage fluids of AAV–miR-511-3p–infected Mrc1–/– mice. Mechanistically, we demonstrated that Ccl2 promotes M1 macrophage polarization by activating RhoA signaling through Ccr2. The interaction between Ccr2 and RhoA was also supported by coimmunoprecipitation assay. Importantly, inhibition of RhoA signaling suppressed cockroach allergen–induced AHR and lung inflammation. These findings suggest a potentially novel mechanism by which miR-511-3p regulates allergic inflammation and macrophage polarization by targeting Ccl2 and its downstream Ccr2/RhoA axis.

Authors

Danh C. Do, Jie Mu, Xia Ke, Karan Sachdeva, Zili Qin, Mei Wan, Faoud T. Ishmael, Peisong Gao

×

Figure 4

Ccl2 is one of the miR-511-3p target genes.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Ccl2 is one of the miR-511-3p target genes.
(A and B) In silico predicti...
(A and B) In silico prediction of miR-511-3p binding site in Ccl2 mRNA in human (hsa-CCL2, A) and mouse (mmu-Ccl2, B) by BiBiServ RNAhybrid. (C) Schematic representation of miR-511-3p–mRNA biotin pulldown assay. B, biotin. (D) Quantitative RT-PCR analyses of Ccl2 in miR-511-3p–mRNA complexes that were isolated from LV–miR-511-3p or LV-Mock control–transfected macrophages (n = 3/group). (E and F) ELISA analysis of Ccl2 levels in supernatants of cultured LV-miR-511-3p or LV-Mock–transfected BMDMs (E, n = 4/group) and mouse BAL fluids of AAV–miR-511-3p–infected Mrc1–/– mice (F, n = 6/group). Data in D were compared by 2-tailed Student’s t test. Data in E and F were compared by 2-way ANOVA. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts