Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Tumor-draining lymph nodes are pivotal in PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint therapy
Marieke F. Fransen, Mark Schoonderwoerd, Philipp Knopf, Marcel G.M. Camps, Lukas J.A.C. Hawinkels, Manfred Kneilling, Thorbald van Hall, Ferry Ossendorp
Marieke F. Fransen, Mark Schoonderwoerd, Philipp Knopf, Marcel G.M. Camps, Lukas J.A.C. Hawinkels, Manfred Kneilling, Thorbald van Hall, Ferry Ossendorp
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Immunology Oncology

Tumor-draining lymph nodes are pivotal in PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint therapy

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint therapy for cancer is commonly considered to act by reactivating T cells in the tumor microenvironment. Here, we present data from 2 mouse tumor models demonstrating an essential involvement of tumor-draining lymph nodes in PD-1 and PD-L1 therapeutic efficacy. Immune activation induced by checkpoint treatment was predominantly observed in the tumor-draining, but not nondraining, lymph nodes and was reflected in local accumulation of CD8+ T cells. Surgical resection of these lymph nodes, but not contralateral lymph nodes, abolished therapy-induced tumor regressions and was associated with decreased immune infiltrate in the tumor microenvironment. Moreover, inhibitor FTY720, which locks lymphocytes in lymph organs, also abrogated checkpoint therapy, suggesting that the tumor-draining lymph nodes function as sites of T cell invigoration required for checkpoint blockade therapy. Now that PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint treatment is applied in earlier clinical stages of cancer, our preclinical data advocate for enrolling patients with their tumor-draining lymph nodes still in place, to optimally engage the antitumor immune response and thereby enhance clinical benefit.

Authors

Marieke F. Fransen, Mark Schoonderwoerd, Philipp Knopf, Marcel G.M. Camps, Lukas J.A.C. Hawinkels, Manfred Kneilling, Thorbald van Hall, Ferry Ossendorp

×

Figure 2

Essential role of TDLNs in checkpoint therapy.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Essential role of TDLNs in checkpoint therapy.
Mice bearing subcutaneous...
Mice bearing subcutaneous tumors in the right flank were treated with checkpoint blocker therapy immediately following lymph node resection surgery or mock surgery. (A–D) C57BL/6 mice bearing MC38 tumors were treated with PD-1–blocking Ab immediately following lymph node resection surgery. (A) Average outgrowth of mice treated with PD-1 Ab systemically (2 × 100 πg i.p.). Average ± SEM are depicted. Statistical analysis of average tumor outgrowth difference on day 14 was calculated by 1-way ANOVA, 10 mice per group. Res: resection. (B) Survival of mice treated with PD-1 Ab systemically (2 × 100 πg i.p.). Statistical difference was analyzed with log-rank test, 10 mice per group. (C) Survival of mice treated with PD-1 Ab systemically (2 × 100 πg i.p.). TDLNs were resected 7 days after (“res after”) or 1 day before (“res before”) tumor inoculation. Pooled data of 2 independent experiments, with 16 mice per group. Statistical difference was analyzed with log-rank test. (D) Average tumor outgrowth of mice treated with local injection of low-dose PD-1 Ab (1 × 50 πg s.c.), with TDLNs or NDLNs resected before PD-1 treatment, 8 mice per group. Average ± SEM are depicted. Statistical difference in average tumor size on day 20 was calculated by 1-way ANOVA. (E) BALB/c mice bearing subcutaneous CT26 tumors in the right flank were treated with PD-L1 Ab systemically. Average tumor outgrowth ± SEM are depicted. One representative experiment is shown from 2 performed, with 8 mice per group. Statistical analysis of average tumor size on day 20 was calculated with 1-way ANOVA (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.005, NS: nonsignificant).

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts